ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
On average time complexity of evolutionary negative selection algorithms for anomaly detection
Full text PdfPdf (1.20 MB)
Source
ACM/SIGEVO Summit on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation archive
Proceedings of the first ACM/SIGEVO Summit on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation table of contents
Shanghai, China
SESSION: Full papers table of contents
Pages 631-638  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-326-6
Authors
Baoliang Xu  University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
Wenjian Luo  University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
Xingxin Pei  University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
Min Zhang  University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
Xufa Wang  University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
Sponsors
SIGEVO: ACM Special Interest Group on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 20,   Downloads (12 Months): 45,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1543834.1543920
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Evolutionary Negative Selection Algorithms have been proposed and used in artificial immune system community for years. However, there are no theoretical analyses about the average time complexity of such algorithms. In this paper, the average time complexity of Evolutionary Negative Selection Algorithms for anomaly detection is studied, and the results demonstrate that its average time complexity depends on the self set very much. Some simulation experiments are done, and it is demonstrated that the theoretical results approximately agree with the experimental results. The work in this paper not only gives the average time complexity of Evolutionary Negative Selection Algorithms for the first time, but also would be helpful to understand why different immune responses (i.e. primary/cross-reactive/secondary immune response) in biological immune system have different efficiencies.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
Dasgupta, D., Ji, Z. and Gonzalez, F. 2003. Artificial Immune System (AIS) Research in the Last Five Years. IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation. 1, 123--130.
 
5
Luo, W., Wang, J. and Wang, X. 2005. Evolutionary Negative Selection Algorithms for Anomaly Detection. In 8th Joint Conference on Information Sciences, Salt Lake City, Utah. 440--445.
 
6
Castro, L. N. d. and Zuben, F. J. V. 2002. Learning and Optimization Using the Clonal Selection Principle. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation. 6, 239--251.
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
Kim, J. 2002. Integrating Artificial Immune Algorithms for Intrusion Detection. Ph.D. Thesis: Department of Computer Science, University College London.
 
11
Kim, J. and Bentley, P. J. 1999. Negative Selection and Niching by an Artificial Immune System for Network Intrusion Detection. In Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference. Orlando, Florida. 149--158.
 
12
 
13
Kim, J. and Bentley, P. J. 2002. A Model of Gene Library Evolution in The Dynamic Clonal Selection Algorithm. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Artificial Immune Systems, Canterbury, 175--182.
 
14
Luo, W., Cao, X. and Wang, X. 2005. Research on Adaptively Generating Detector Algorithm. Acta Automatica Sinica. 31, 907--16 (In Chinese).
 
15
Luo, W., Guo, P. and Wang, X. 2008. On Convergence of Evolutionary Negative Selection Algorithms for Anomaly Detection. IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation. 2933--9.
 
16
 
17
Luo, W., Zhang, Y., Wang, X. and Wang, X. 2006. Experimental Analyses of Evolutionary Negative Selection Algorithm for Function Optimization. Journal of Harbin Engineering University. 27(B07), 158--163 (In Chinese).
 
18
Zhang, Z., Luo, W. and Wang, X. 2007. Research of Mobile Robots Path Planning Algorithm Based on Immune Evolutionary Negative Selection Mechanism. Journal of Electronics and Information Technology. 29(8), 1987--1991 (In Chinese).
 
19
Cao, X., Zhang, S. and Wang, X. 2001. Immune Optimization System Based on Immune Recognition. In International Conference on Neural Information Processing. 1,3, 535--541.
 
20
Gonzalez, F. and Dasgupta, D. 2002. An Immunogenetic Approach to Intrusion Detection. In Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, New York.
 
21
 
22
He, J. and Yao, X. 2002. From an Individual to a Population: An Analysis of The First Hitting Time of Populationbased Evolutionary Algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation. 6, 5, 495--511.
 
23
Luo, W., Zhang, Z. and Wang, X. 2006. A Heuristic Detector Generation Algorithm for Negative Selection Algorithm with Hamming Distance Partial Matching Rule. In the International Conference on Artificial Immune Systems, LNCS 4163, Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Oeiras, Portugal. 229--243.
24
 
25
Balachandran, S., Dasgupta, D., Nino, F. and Garrett, D. 2007. A Framework for Evolving Multi-Shaped Detectors in Negative Selection. In Proceeding of the IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence. 401--408.
 
26
Zhang, S., Cao, X. and Wang, X. 2002. Immune Algorithm Based on Immune Recognition. Acta Electronica Sinica. 30, 12, 1840--1844 (In Chinese).
 
27
 
28

Collaborative Colleagues:
Baoliang Xu: colleagues
Wenjian Luo: colleagues
Xingxin Pei: colleagues
Min Zhang: colleagues
Xufa Wang: colleagues