| Space transformation search: a new evolutionary technique |
| Full text |
Pdf
(391 KB)
|
Source
|
ACM/SIGEVO Summit on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation
archive
Proceedings of the first ACM/SIGEVO Summit on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation
table of contents
Shanghai, China
SESSION: Full papers
table of contents
Pages: 537-544
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-326-6
|
|
Authors
|
|
Hui Wang
|
Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
|
|
Zhijian Wu
|
Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
|
|
Yong Liu
|
University of Aizu, Fukushima, Japan
|
|
Jing Wang
|
Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
|
|
Dazhi Jiang
|
Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
|
|
Lili Chen
|
Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
|
|
| Sponsors |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 7, Downloads (12 Months): 43, Citation Count: 0
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
In this paper, a new evolutionary technique is proposed, namely space transformation search (STS), which transforms current search space to a new search space. By simultaneously evaluating solutions in current search space and transformed space, we can provide more chances to find solutions more closely to the global optimum and finally accelerate convergence speed. The proposed STS method can be applied to many evolutionary algorithms, and this paper only presents a STS based particle swarm optimization (PSO-STS). Experimental studies on 20 benchmark functions including 10 shifted functions show that the PSO-STS and its variations can not only achieve better results, but also obtain faster convergence speed than the standard PSO.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
|
| |
2
|
D. E. Goldberg, and K. Deb. A comparative analysis of selection schemes used in genetic algorithms. Foundations of Genetic Algorithms, pp. 69--73, 1991.
|
| |
3
|
J. Li, L. Kang and Z. Wu. An adaptive neighborhood-based multi-parent crossover operator for real-coded genetic algorithms. In Proc. Congr. Evol. Comput., pp. 14--21, 2003.
|
| |
4
|
X.Yao, Y.Liu and G.Lin. Evolutionary programming made faster.IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput., vol. 3, pp. 82--102, 1999.
|
| |
5
|
J. Kennedy and R. C. Eberhart. Particle swarm optimization. In Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Neural Networks, pp. 1942--1948,1995.
|
| |
6
|
D. Joslin and J. Collins. Greedy transformation for evolutionary algorithm search spaces for scheduling problems. In Proc. Congr. Evol. Comput., 2007, pp. 407--414.
|
| |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
D. H. Wolpert, and W. G. Macready. No free lunch theorems for optimization. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput., vol. 1, pp. 67--82, 1997.
|
| |
9
|
S. Rahnamayan, H. R. Tizhoosh and M. M. A. Salama. Opposition-Based differential evolution, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput., vol.12, pp. 64--79, 2008.
|
| |
10
|
H. Wang, Y. Liu, S. Y. Zeng, H. Li and C. H. Li. Opposition-based particle swarm algorithm with Cauchy mutation. In Proc. Congr. Evol. Comput., 2007, pp. 4750--4756.
|
| |
11
|
A. R. Malisia and H. R. Tizhoosh, Applying opposition-Based ideas to the ant colony system. In Proc. IEEE Swarm Intelligence Symposium, pp. 182--189, 2007.
|
| |
12
|
X. Hu, Y. Shi and R. C. Eberhart. Recent advances in particle swarm. In Proc. Congr. Evol. Comput, pp. 90--97, 2004.
|
| |
13
|
Y. Shi and R. C. Eberhart. A modified particle swarm optimizer. In Proc. Congr. Evol. Comput, pp. 69--73, 1998.
|
| |
14
|
H. Wang, Y. Liu, C. H. Li, and S. Y. Zeng. A hybrid particle swarm algorithm with Cauchy mutation. In Proc. IEEE Swarm Intelligence Symposium, Honolulu, Hawaii, 2007, pp. 356--360,2007.
|
|