ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Digital Library logoTake a look at the new version of this page: [ beta version ]. Tell us what you think.
The effect of crossover on evolution ability of population
Full text PdfPdf (550 KB)
Source
ACM/SIGEVO Summit on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation archive
Proceedings of the first ACM/SIGEVO Summit on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation table of contents
Shanghai, China
SESSION: Full papers table of contents
Pages: 113-118  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-326-6
Authors
Qingwu Fan  Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, China
Pu Wang  Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, China
Jing Huang  Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, China
Sponsors
SIGEVO: ACM Special Interest Group on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 3,   Downloads (12 Months): 28,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1543834.1543851
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Currently most of the analysis about the running mechanism of GA focuses on the convergence problem while few focus on population characteristics after the single generation descendiblity. This paper presents the concept of evolution ability of population and discusses the ability of finding the optimal solution for the population after one-generation selection, crossover and mutation. Based on the analysis of effect of crossover on evolution ability of population, this paper presents some important conclusions. The important method to improve evolution ability of population is to include larger crossover optimal solution area in a smaller crossover family area. If the crossover optimal solution area isn't included in any crossover family area of population, the population either converges to the optimal solution, or evolution will be trapped in the premature of convergence. These conclusions above do not only help improve the GA, but also provide the basis for later research work.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
Li M Q, Kou J S, Lin D. Genetic algorithm theory and applications. Beijing: Science Press, 2002
 
3
Zhang W X, Liang Y. Mathematical foundation of genetic algorithms. Xi'an: Xi'an Jiaotong University Press, 2006
 
4
 
5
Rudolph G. Convergence properties of canonical genetic algorithms. IEEE Trans on Neural Networks, 1994, 5(1): 96 101
 
6
Cerf R. Asymptotic convergence of genetic algorithms. Adv Appl Prob, 1998, 30:521--550
 
7
Fogel D. B. Asymptotic convergence properties of genetic algorithms and evolutionary programming. Analysis and experiments, Cybernetics and Systems, 1994, 25(2): 389--407
 
8
Suzuki J. A Markov chain analysis on simple genetic algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1995, 25(4):650--659
 
9
Suzuki J. A further result on the Markov chain model of genetic algorithms and its application to simulated annealing-like-strategy. IEEE Trans Sys, Man, and Cybernetics, 1998, 28(1)
 
10
Xu Z.B., Chen Z.P. Theoretical development on genetic algorithms: a review. Advances in Mathematics, 2000, 29(2):97--114
 
11
Xu Z B, Nie Z K, Zhang W X. Almost sure convergence of genetic algorithms: A martingale approach. Chinese Journal of Computers, 2002,25(8): 785--793
 
12
XU Zong ben, NIE Zan kan, ZHANG Wei xiu. Further Results on Convergence Analysis of Genetic Algorithms Based on axiomatation Model. Chinese Journal of Engineering Mathematics, 2001, 18(1): 1--11

Collaborative Colleagues:
Qingwu Fan: colleagues
Pu Wang: colleagues
Jing Huang: colleagues