|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ABSTRACT
A rectilinear path between two points p,q∈ R2 is a path connecting p and q with all its line segments horizontal or vertical segments. Furthermore, a Manhattan path between p and q is a rectilinear path with its length exactly dist(p,q):=|p.x-q.x|+|p.y-q.y|. Given a set T of n points in R2, a network G is said to be a Manhattan network on T, if for all p,q ∈ T there exists a Manhattan path between p and q with all its line segments in G. For the given point set T, the Minimum Manhattan Network (MMN) Problem is to find a Manhattan network G on T with the minimum network length. In this paper, we shall prove that the decision version of MMN is strongly NP-complete, using the reduction from the well-known 3-SAT problem, which requires a number of gadgets. The gadgets have similar structures, but play different roles in simulating the 3-SAT formula. The reduction has been implemented with a computer program. REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
INDEX TERMS
Primary Classification:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||