ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
The geodesic farthest-site Voronoi diagram in a polygonal domain with holes
Full text PdfPdf (493 KB)
Source
Annual Symposium on Computational Geometry archive
Proceedings of the 25th annual symposium on Computational geometry table of contents
Aarhus, Denmark
SESSION: Tuesday, June 9, 3:00-4:20 pm table of contents
Pages 198-207  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-501-7
Authors
Sang Won Bae  POSTECH, Pohang, South Korea
Kyung-Yong Chwa  KAIST, Daejeon, South Korea
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
SIGGRAPH: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 29,   Downloads (12 Months): 74,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1542362.1542402
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We investigate the farthest-site Voronoi diagram of k point sites with respect to the geodesic distance in a polygonal domain of n corners and h (≥ 0) holes. In the case of h=0, Aronov et al. [2] in 1993 proved that there are at most O(k) faces in the diagram and the complexity of the diagram is at most O(n+k). However, any nontrivial upper bound on the geodesic farthest-site Voronoi diagram in a polygonal domain when h > 0 remains unknown afterwards. In this paper, we show that the diagram in a polygonal domain consists of Θ(hk) faces and its total combinatorial complexity is Θ(nk) in the worst case for any h ≥ 1. Interestingly, the worst-case complexity of the diagram is independent from the number h of holes if h ≥ 1 while the maximum possible number of faces is dependent on h rather than on the complexity n of the polygonal domain. Also, we present an O(nk log2(n+k) log k)-time algorithm that constructs the diagram explicitly.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
B. Aronov. On the geodesic Voronoi diagram of point sites in a simple polygon. Algorithmica, 4(1-4):109--140, 1989.
 
2
B. Aronov, S. Fortune, and G. Wilfong. The furthest-site geodesic Voronoi diagram. Discrete Comput. Geom., 9:217--255, 1993.
 
3
O. Cheong, H. Everett, M. Glisse, J. Gudmundsson, S. Hornus, S. Lazard, M. Lee, and H.-S. Na. Farthest-polygon Voronoi diagrams. In Proc. 15th Annu. Euro. Sympos. Algo., volume 4698 of LNCS, pages 407--418, 2007.
 
4
5
 
6
 
7
K. Mehlhorn, S. Meiser, and R. Rasch. Furthest site abstract Voronoi diagrams. Internat. J. Comput. Geom. Appl., 11(6):583--616, 2001.
 
8
J. S. B. Mitchell. Shortest paths among obstacles in the plane. Internat. J. Comput. Geom. Appl., 6(3):309--331, 1996.
 
9
 
10
J. R. Munkres. Topology. Prentice Hall, Inc., second edition, 2000.
 
11
J. O'Rourke and S. Suri. Polygons. In Handbook of discrete and computational geometry, chapter 26, pages 583--606. CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2nd edition, 2004.
 
12
E. Papadopoulou and D. T. Lee. A new approach for the geodesic Voronoi diagram of points in a simple polygon and other restricted polygonal domains. Algorithmica, 20(4):319--352, 1998.
 
13
14
 
15
 
16

Collaborative Colleagues:
Sang Won Bae: colleagues
Kyung-Yong Chwa: colleagues