| Kinetic spanners in Rd |
| Full text |
Pdf
(638 KB)
|
Source
|
Annual Symposium on Computational Geometry
archive
Proceedings of the 25th annual symposium on Computational geometry
table of contents
Aarhus, Denmark
SESSION: Monday, June 8th, 10:50-11:50 am
table of contents
Pages 43-50
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-501-7
|
|
Authors
|
|
| Sponsors |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 8, Downloads (12 Months): 32, Citation Count: 0
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
We present a new (1+ε)-spanner for sets of n points in Rd. Our spanner has size O(n/εd-1) and maximum degree O(logd n). The main advantage of our spanner is that it can be maintained efficiently as the points move: Assuming the trajectories of the points can be described by bounded-degree polynomials, the number of topological changes to the spanner is O(n2/εd-1), and using a supporting data structure of size O(n logdn) we can handle events in time O(logd+1n). Moreover, the spanner can be updated in time O(log n) if the flight plan of a point changes. This is the first kinetic spanner for points in Rd whose performance does not depend on the spread of the point set.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
 |
1
|
|
 |
2
|
|
| |
3
|
|
 |
4
|
|
| |
5
|
|
 |
6
|
|
| |
7
|
|
 |
8
|
|
 |
9
|
|
| |
10
|
D. Eppstein. Spanning trees and spanners. In: J.-R. Sack and J. Urrutia (eds.), Handbook of Computational Geometry, Elsevier Science Publishers, pages 425--461, 2000.
|
| |
11
|
|
| |
12
|
|
| |
13
|
|
| |
14
|
J. Gudmundsson and C. Knauer. Dilation and detour in geometric networks. In: T. Gonzalez (ed.), Handbook on approximation algorithms and metaheuristics. Chapter 52. Chapman & Hall/CRC, 2006.
|
| |
15
|
|
| |
16
|
L. J. Guibas. Motion. In: J. Goodman and J. O'Rourke (eds.), Handbook of Discrete and Computational Geometry, pages 1117--1134. CRC Press, 2nd edition, 2004.
|
| |
17
|
|
| |
18
|
|
| |
19
|
|
 |
20
|
|
| |
21
|
|
| |
22
|
J. Soares. Graph spanners: A survey. Congresus Numerantium, 89:225--238, 1992.
|
 |
23
|
|
|