|
ABSTRACT
Given a set system (X,R), the hitting set problem is to find a smallest-cardinality subset H ⊆ X, with the property that each range R ∈ R has a non-empty intersection with H. We present near-linear time approximation algorithms for the hitting set problem, under the following geometric settings: (i) R is a set of planar regions with small union complexity. (ii) R is a set of axis-parallel d-rectangles in d-space. In both cases X is either the entire d-dimensional space or a finite set of points in d-space. The approximation factors yielded by the algorithm are small; they are either the same as or within an O(log n) factor of the best factors known to be computable in polynomial time.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
P. K. Agarwal. Range searching. In Handbook of Discrete and Computational Geometry, (J. Goodman and J. O'Rourke, eds.), CRC Press, New York, pp. 809--838, 2004.
|
| |
2
|
Pankaj K. Agarwal , Danny Z. Chen , Shashidhara K. Ganjugunte , Ewa Misiołek , Micha Sharir , Kai Tang, Stabbing Convex Polygons with a Segment or a Polygon, Proceedings of the 16th annual European symposium on Algorithms, September 15-17, 2008, Karlsruhe, Germany
[doi> 10.1007/978-3-540-87744-8_5]
|
| |
3
|
|
| |
4
|
|
| |
5
|
P. K. Agarwal, E. Ezra, and S. Ganjugunte. Efficient sensor placement for surveillance problems. Submitted for publicaiton.
|
| |
6
|
|
| |
7
|
P. K. Agarwal, J. Pach and M. Sharir. State of the union, of geometric objects: A review.In Surveys on Discrete and Computational Geometry,(J. Goodman, J. Pach and R. Pollack, eds.),AMS, Providence, RI, pp. 9--48, 2008.
|
| |
8
|
P. K. Agarwal and M. Sharir. Arrangements and their applications. In Handbook of Computational Geometry, (J. Sack and J. Urrutia, eds.), Elsevier, Amsterdam,pp. 49--119, 2000.
|
| |
9
|
|
 |
10
|
|
| |
11
|
|
| |
12
|
H. Brönnimann and M. T. Goodrich.Almost optimal set covers in finite VC dimensions. Discrete Comput. Geom., 14(1995):463--479.
|
| |
13
|
|
 |
14
|
|
| |
15
|
|
| |
16
|
|
| |
17
|
|
| |
18
|
|
| |
19
|
|
| |
20
|
M. de Berg, K. Dobrindt, and O. Schwarzkopf. On lazy randomized incremental construction. Discrete Comput. Geom., 14(1995):261--286.
|
| |
21
|
|
| |
22
|
H. Edelsbrunner , L. Guibas , J. Hershiberger , J. Pach , R. Pollack , R. Seidel , M. Sharir , J. Snoeyink, On arrangements of Jordan arcs with three intersections per pair, Discrete & Computational Geometry, v.4 n.5, p.523-539, 1989
[doi> 10.1007/BF02187745]
|
| |
23
|
|
 |
24
|
|
 |
25
|
|
| |
26
|
R. Fowler, M. Paterson, and S. Tanimoto. Optimal packing and covering in the plane are NP-complete. Inf. Proc. Letts, 12(1981):133--137.
|
| |
27
|
G. N. Frederickson and D. B. Johnson. Generalized selectionand ranking: sorted matrices. SIAM J. Comput.,13(1984):14--30.
|
| |
28
|
|
| |
29
|
D. Haussler and E. Welzl. ε-nets and simplex range queries.phDiscrete Comput. Geom., 2(1987):127--151.
|
 |
30
|
|
| |
31
|
S. Lauen. Geometric set cover and hitting sets for polytopes in R3. Proc. 25th Int. Sympos. Theoret. Aspects Comput. Sci., 479--490, 2008.
|
| |
32
|
|
| |
33
|
|
| |
34
|
|
 |
35
|
Jiří Matoušek , Raimund Seidel , E. Welzl, How to net a lot with little: small &egr;-nets for disks and halfspaces, Proceedings of the sixth annual symposium on Computational geometry, p.16-22, June 07-09, 1990, Berkley, California, United States
[doi> 10.1145/98524.98530]
|
| |
36
|
|
| |
37
|
|
| |
38
|
K. Mulmuley. Computational Geometry: An Introduction through Randomized Algorithms. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1994.
|
| |
39
|
|
 |
40
|
|
| |
41
|
|
| |
42
|
J. Urrutia. Art Gallery and illumination problems. In Handbook of Computational Geometry, (J. Sack and J. Urrutia, eds), Elsevier, Amsterdam, pages 973--1027, 2000.
|
| |
43
|
|
|