| Peer-assisted online storage and distribution: modeling and server strategies |
| Full text |
Pdf
(367 KB)
|
Source
|
International Workshop on Network and Operating System Support for Digital Audio and Video
archive
Proceedings of the 18th international workshop on Network and operating systems support for digital audio and video
table of contents
Williamsburg, VA, USA
SESSION: New applications and services
table of contents
Pages 13-18
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-433-1
|
|
Authors
|
|
Ye Sun
|
Hong Kong University of Science & Technology, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
|
|
Fangming Liu
|
Hong Kong University of Science & Technology, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
|
|
Bo Li
|
Hong Kong University of Science & Technology, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
|
|
Baochun Li
|
University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
|
|
| Sponsors |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4, Downloads (12 Months): 41, Citation Count: 0
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
Peer-assisted online storage and distribution systems have recently enjoyed large-scale deployment gaining increased popularity for multimedia content sharing in the Internet. Such systems typically deploy dedicated servers while effectively leveraging peer bandwidth in a complementary fashion, in order to guarantee adequate levels of service quality and minimize server cost. In this paper, motivated by our recent empirical study on a real-world system, FS2You, we develop a mathematical model to characterize and understand peer-assisted online storage systems serving multiple files of different popularity. Specifically, we examine and compare representative server bandwidth allocation strategies, and investigate the critical performance metrics and factors. We demonstrate that different server strategies may lead to remarkably different service qualities in terms of average downloading times, peer satisfaction levels and service quality differentiation. In particular, the current server strategy in FS2You is able to offer system-wide average downloading times comparable to the theoretical bound derived from our model.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
S. Das, S. Tewari, and L. Kleinrock. The Case for Servers in a Peer-to-Peer World. In Proc. of IEEE ICC, June 2006.
|
| |
2
|
FS2You. http://www.rayfile.com.
|
| |
3
|
Z. Ge, D. R. Figueiredo, S. Jaiswal, J. Kurose, and D. Towsley. Modeling Peer-Peer File Sharing Systems. In Proc. of IEEE INFOCOM, March 2003.
|
| |
4
|
Lei Guo , Songqing Chen , Zhen Xiao , Enhua Tan , Xiaoning Ding , Xiaodong Zhang, Measurements, analysis, and modeling of BitTorrent-like systems, Proceedings of the 5th ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet Measurement, p.4-4, October 19-21, 2005, Berkeley, CA
|
| |
5
|
F. Liu, Y. Sun, B. Li, and X. Zhang. Understanding the Roles of Servers in Large-scale Peer-Assisted Online Storage Systems. In Proc. of IEEE ICC, June 2009.
|
 |
6
|
|
 |
7
|
Dongyu Qiu , R. Srikant, Modeling and performance analysis of BitTorrent-like peer-to-peer networks, Proceedings of the 2004 conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communications, August 30-September 03, 2004, Portland, Oregon, USA
|
| |
8
|
Y. Sun, F. Liu, B. Li, B. Li, and X. Zhang. FS2You: Peer-Assisted Semi-Persistent Online Storage at a Large Scale. In Proc. of IEEE INFOCOM, April 2009.
|
| |
9
|
C. Wu, B. Li, and S. Zhao. Multi-Channel Live P2P Streaming: Refocusing on Servers. In Proc. of IEEE INFOCOM, April 2008.
|
| |
10
|
X. Yang and G. de Veciana. Service Capacity of Peer to Peer Networks. In Proc. of IEEE INFOCOM, March 2004.
|
|