ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Evaluating role mining algorithms
Full text PdfPdf (966 KB)
Source
Symposium on Access Control Models and Technologies archive
Proceedings of the 14th ACM symposium on Access control models and technologies table of contents
Stresa, Italy
SESSION: Role engineering table of contents
Pages 95-104  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-537-6
Authors
Ian Molloy  Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA
Ninghui Li  Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA
Tiancheng Li  Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA
Ziqing Mao  Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA
Qihua Wang  Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA
Jorge Lobo  IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Hawthorne, NY, USA
Sponsors
SIGSAC: ACM Special Interest Group on Security, Audit, and Control
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 11,   Downloads (12 Months): 86,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1542207.1542224
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

While many role mining algorithms have been proposed in recent years, there lacks a comprehensive study to compare these algorithms. These role mining algorithms have been evaluated when they were proposed, but the evaluations were using different datasets and evaluation criteria. In this paper, we introduce a comprehensive framework for evaluating role mining algorithms. We categorize role mining algorithms into two classes based on their outputs; Class 1 algorithms output a sequence of prioritized roles while Class 2 algorithms output complete RBAC states. We then develop techniques that enable us to compare these algorithms directly. We also introduce a new role mining algorithm and two new ways for algorithmically generating datasets for evaluation. Using synthetic as well as real datasets, we compared nine role mining algorithms. Our results illustrate the strengths and weaknesses of these algorithms.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
 
8
9
 
10
I. Molloy, H. Chen, T. Li, Q. Wang, N. Li, E. Bertino, S. Calo, and J. Lobo. Mining roles with multiple objectives. In Review.
11
12
 
13
J. H. Saltzer and M. D. Schroeder. The protection of information in computer systems. Proceedings of the IEEE, 63(9), 1975.
14
15
 
16
S. D. Stoller, P. Yang, C. R. Ramakrishnan, and M. I. Gofman. Efficient policy analysis for administrative role based access control, Oct. 2007.
17
18
19
20

Collaborative Colleagues:
Ian Molloy: colleagues
Ninghui Li: colleagues
Tiancheng Li: colleagues
Ziqing Mao: colleagues
Qihua Wang: colleagues
Jorge Lobo: colleagues