ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
A formal framework to elicit roles with business meaning in RBAC systems
Full text PdfPdf (847 KB)
Source
Symposium on Access Control Models and Technologies archive
Proceedings of the 14th ACM symposium on Access control models and technologies table of contents
Stresa, Italy
SESSION: Role engineering table of contents
Pages 85-94  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-537-6
Authors
Alessandro Colantonio  Engiweb Security, Roma, Italy
Roberto Di Pietro  Università di Roma Tre, Roma, Italy
Alberto Ocello  Engiweb Security, Roma, Italy
Nino Vincenzo Verde  Università di Roma Tre, Roma, Italy
Sponsors
SIGSAC: ACM Special Interest Group on Security, Audit, and Control
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 20,   Downloads (12 Months): 95,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1542207.1542223
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The role-based access control (RBAC) model has proven to be cost effective to reduce the complexity and costs of access permission management. To maximize the advantages offered by RBAC, the role engineering discipline has been introduced. A viable approach is to explore current applications and systems to find de facto roles embedded in existing user permissions, leading to what is usually referred to as role mining. However, a key problem that has not yet been adequately addressed by existing role mining approaches is how to propose roles that have business meaning. In order to do this, we provide a new formal framework that also enjoys practical relevance. In particular, the proposed framework leverages business information - such as business processes and organization structure - to implement role mining algorithms. Our key observation is that a role is likely to be meaningful from a business perspective when it involves activities within the same business process or organizational units within the same branch. To measure the "spreading" of a role among business processes or organization structure, we resort to centrality indices. Such indices are used in our cost-driven approach during the role mining process. Finally, we illustrate the application of the framework through a few examples.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
American National Standards Institute (ANSI) and InterNational Committee for Information Technology Standards (INCITS). ANSI/INCITS 359-2004, Information Technology - Role Based Access Control, 2004.
2
 
3
A. Colantonio, R. Di Pietro, and A. Ocello. Leveraging lattices to improve role mining. In Proceedings of the IFIP TC 11 23rd International Information Security Conference, SEC '08, volume 278 of IFIP International Federation for Information Processing, pages 333--347. Springer, 2008.
 
4
A. Colantonio, R. Di Pietro, A. Ocello, and N. V. Verde. Mining stable roles in RBAC. In Proceedings of the IFIP TC 11 24th International Information Security Conference, SEC '09, volume 297 of IFIP International Federation for Information Processing, pages 259--269. Springer, 2009.
 
5
A. Colantonio, R. Di Pietro, A. Ocello, and N. V. Verde. A probabilistic bound on the basic role mining problem and its applications. In Proceedings of the IFIP TC 11 24th International Information Security Conference, SEC '09, volume 297 of IFIP International Federation for Information Processing, pages 376--386. Springer, 2009.
6
 
7
R. Crook, D. Ince, and B. Nuseibeh. Towards an analytical role modelling framework for security requirements. In Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality, REFSQ '02, 2002.
 
8
9
 
10
11
12
13
14
 
15
 
16
17
18
 
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
 
27
S. Wasserman and K. Faust. Social Network Analysis, chapter 5, pages 169--219. Cambridge University Press, 1994.
28

Collaborative Colleagues:
Alessandro Colantonio: colleagues
Roberto Di Pietro: colleagues
Alberto Ocello: colleagues
Nino Vincenzo Verde: colleagues