Self-setting of physical activity goals and effects on perceived difficulty, importance and competence

ABSTRACT

Goal setting can be a powerful method for persuading individuals to adopt an active lifestyle. In order for this to be the case, it is important to set concrete and challenging goals, and to strongly commit to them. In this study, we explored how people set goals for physical activity and how these goals were reflected in self-regulatory mechanisms to drive goal attainment. Our approach is novel in two ways: first, we used an unobtrusive wearable sensor to accurately measure physical activity throughout the day rather than rely on self-report, and second, we provided individuals with feedback about the contribution of their common daily activities (e.g., household activities) to their physical activity level. Our results showed that on the basis of this feedback, participants were able to indicate to what degree they intended to change their behavior. Nevertheless, they failed to set concrete goals that matched their intentions precisely. In particular, we observed that overall the set goals were in accordance with intentions (i.e., goals were set in the desired direction), but we saw a strong tendency to focus on enhancing vigorous activity at the cost of moderate intensity activity. This suggests that many individuals have intentions to change and goal setting support is needed to compose goals that accurately reflect these intentions. Technology-mediated interventions might be ideal to support individuals along that path.

REFERENCES

• 1: Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84: 191--215.
• 2: Bravata, D. M., Smith-Spangler, C., Sundaram, V. et al. (2007). Using Pedometers to Increase Physical Activity and Improve Health: A Systematic Review. JAMA, 298 (19): 2296--2304.
• 3: Brown, D. W., Balluz, L. S., Heath, G. W., Moriarty, D. G., Ford, E. S., Giles, W. H., and Mokdad, A. H. (2003). Associations between recommended levels of physical activity and health-related quality of life: Findings from the 2001 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) survey. Preventive Medicine, 37: 520--528.
• 4: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (1996). Physical Activity and Health: A Report of the Surgeon General.
• 5: Garland, H. A (1985). Cognitive mediation theory of task goals and human performance. Motivation and Emotion, 9: 345--367.
• 6: Klein, H. J., Wesson, M. J., Hollenbeck, J. R., and Alge, B. J. (1999). Goal Commitment and the Goal-Setting Process: Conceptual Clarification and Empirical Synthesis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84 (6): 885--896.
• 7: Kroll, T., Kehn, M., Ho, P. S., and Groah, S. (2007). The SCI Exercise Self-Efficacy Scale (ESES): development and psychometric properties. The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 4:34.
• 8: Joyca Lacroix , Privender Saini , Annelies Goris, Understanding user cognitions to guide the tailoring of persuasive technology-based physical activity interventions, Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology, April 26-29, 2009, Claremont, California [doi>10.1145/1541948.1541961]
• 9: Joyca Lacroix , Privender Saini , Roger Holmes, The relationship between goal difficulty and performance in the context of a physical activity intervention program, Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Human computer interaction with mobile devices and services, September 02-05, 2008, Amsterdam, The Netherlands [doi>10.1145/1409240.1409302]
• 10: Locke, E. and Latham, G. (2002). Building a Practically Useful Theory of Goal Setting and Task Motivation: A 35-Year Odyssey. American Psychologist, 57 (9): 705--717.
• 11: Locke, E. A., Shaw, K. N., Saari, L. M., and Latham, G. P. (1981). Goal Setting and Task Performance: 1969-1980. Psychological Bulletin, 90 (1): 125--152.
• 12: McAuley, E., and Blissmer, B. (2000). Self-efficacy determinants and consequences of physical activity. Exercise and Sport Science Reviews, 28: 85--88.
• 13: Mento, A., Locke, E., & Klein, H. (1992). Relationship of goal level to valence and instrumentality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77: 395--405.
• 14: Netz, Y., Wu, M. J., Becker, B. J., and Tenenbaum, G. (2005). Psychology and Aging, 20 (2): 272--284.
• 15: Penedo, F. J. and Dahn, J. R. (2005). Exercise and well-being: a review of mental and physical health benefits associated with physical activity. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 18: 189--193.
• 16: Plasqui, G., Joosen, A. M., Kester, A. D., Goris, A. H. and Westerterp, K. R. Measuring free-living energy expenditure and physical activity with triaxial accelerometry. Obesity Research 13, 8 (2005): 1363--1369.
• 17: Shilts, M. K., Horowitz, M., and Townsend, M. (2004). Goal Setting as a Strategy for Dietary and Physical Activity Behavior Change: A Review of the Literature. American Journal of Health Promotion, 19:81--93.
• 18: Smith, J. A., Hauenstein, N. M. A., and Buchanan, L. B. (1996). Goal Setting and Exercise Performance. Human Performance, 9: 141--154.
• 19: Yearta, S. K., Maitlis, S., and Briner, R. B. (1995). An Exloratory Study of Goal Setting in Theory and Practice: A motivational Technique that works? Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 68: 237--252.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  J. Computer Applications
  J.3 LIFE AND MEDICAL SCIENCES
      Subjects: Health

General Terms:
Experimentation, Human Factors, Measurement

Keywords:
activity monitor, goal setting, goal setting theory, physical activity