Understanding user cognitions to guide the tailoring of persuasive technology-based physical activity interventions

ABSTRACT

The growing number of people with an inactive lifestyle emphasizes the need for highly persuasive physical activity interventions. Modern technological developments bring great promise for the realization of such large-scale persuasive behavior change interventions because they allow for user tailored interaction. For the effective tailoring of technology-based interventions, a profound understanding of the main variables underlying physical activity behavior is required. In this paper, we focus on three cognitive variables that have shown to be crucial for the adoption and maintenance of health behaviors: behavioral regulation, types of motives, and self-efficacy. In particular, we explore the relationship of these cognitive variables with actual levels of daily-life physical activity. Our study differs from related studies in two important ways. First, we consider the entire range of physical activities performed throughout the day while many studies focused on sports and or dedicated exercise. Second, we employ a wearable device for the objective measurement of daily physical activity levels rather than rely on self-report measures. Our results show that active individuals feel higher levels of self-determined behavioral regulation, experience stronger motives to be active (in particular for health and well-being related motives), and have higher levels of self-efficacy for daily-life physical activity than inactive individuals. We argue that tailored technology-based activity interventions should accommodate these cognitive variables and for inactive individuals, aim to gradually induce and internalize the cognitions already experienced by active individuals.

REFERENCES

• 1: Bandura, A. 1977. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191--215.
• 2: Buckworth, J., Lee, R. E., Regan, G., Schneider, L. K. and DiClemente, C. C. 2007. Decomposing intrinsic and extrinsic motivation for exercise: Application to stages of motivational readiness. Psychology of Sport and Exercise 8, 4, 441--461.
• 3: Deci, E. L., and Ryan, R. M. 1985. Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Publishing Co.
• 4: Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (Eds.) 2002. Handbook of self-determination research. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
• 5: Doshi, A., Patrick, K., Sallis, J. F. and Calfas, K. 2003. Evaluation of physical activity web sites for use of behavior change theories. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 25, 105--111.
• 6: Hagger, M. S. and Chatzisarantis, N. L. D. (Eds.). 2007. Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in exercise and sport. Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL, USA, 2007.
• 7: Haskell, W. L, Lee, I. M., Pate, R. R., Powell, K. E., Blair, S. N., Franklin, B. A., Macera, C. A., Heath, G. W., Thompson, P. D. and Bauman, A. 2007. Physical activity and public health: updated recommendation for adults from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Circulation 116, 9, 1081--93
• 8: Ingledew, D. K. and Markland, D. 2007. The role of motives in exercise participation. Psychology and Health 7, 23, 1--22.
• 9: Ingledew, D. K., Markland, D. and Medley, A. R. 1998. Exercise motives and stages of change. Journal of Health Psychology 3, 4, 477--489.
• 10: Kroeze, W., Werkman A. and Brug, J. 2006. A systematic review of randomized trials on the effectiveness of computer-tailored education on physical activity and dietary behaviors. Annals of Behavioral Medicine 31, 3, 205--223.
• 11: Kroll, T., Kehn, M., Ho, P. S., and Groah, S. 2007. The SCI Exercise Self-Efficacy Scale (ESES): development and psychometric properties. The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 4:34.
• 12: Lee, L-L., Arthur, A., and Avis, M. 2008. Using self-efficacy theory to develop interventions that help older people overcome psychological barriers to physical activity: a discussion paper. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 45, 1690--1699.
• 13: Marcus B. H., Williams D. M., Dubbert P. M., Sallis J. F., King A. C., Yancey A. K., Franklin B. A., Buchner D., Daniels S. R., Claytor R. P. 2006. Physical Activity Intervention Studies: What We Know and What We Need to Know: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism (Subcommittee on Physical Activity); Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young; and the Interdisciplinary Working Group on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research. Circulation, 114: 2739--2752.
• 14: Markland, D. and Tobin, V. 2004. A modification of the Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire to include an assessment of amotivation. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 26, 191--196.
• 15: McAuley, E., Courneya, K. S., Rudolph, D. L., and Lox, C. L. 1994. Enhancing exercise adherence in middle-aged males and females. Preventive Medicine 23, 498--506.
• 16: McAuley, E., Pena, M. M., and Jerome, G. J. 2001. Self-efficacy as a determinant and an outcome of exercise. In Advances in Motivation in Sport and Exercise, G. C. Roberts, Ed. Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL, 235--261.
• 17: Penedo, J. R. and Dahn, F. J. 2005. Exercise and well-being: A review of mental and physical health benefits associated with physical activity. Current Opinion in Psychiatry 18, 2, 189--193.
• 18: Plasqui, G., Joosen, A. M., Kester, A. D., Goris, A. H. and Westerterp, K. R. 2005. Measuring free-living energy expenditure and physical activity with triaxial accelerometry. Obesity Research 13, 8, 1363--1369.
• 19: Portnoy, D. B., Scott-Sheldon, L. A. J., Johnson, B. T. and Carey, M. P. 2008. Computer-delivered interventions for health promotion and behavioral risk reduction: a meta-analysis of 75 randomized controlled trials, 1988-2007. Preventive Medicine, 47, 3--16.
• 20: Privender Saini , Joyca Lacroix, Self-setting of physical activity goals and effects on perceived difficulty, importance and competence, Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology, April 26-29, 2009, Claremont, California [doi>10.1145/1541948.1541992]
• 21: Thogersen-Ntoumani, C., and Ntoumanis, N. 2008. The role of self-determined motivation in the understanding of exercise-related behaviors, cognitions and physical self-evaluations. Journal of Sports Sciences, 24, 393--404.
• 22: Tufano, J. T., and Karras, B. T. 2005. Mobile eHealth Interventions for obesity: a timely opportunity to leverage convergence trends. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 7(5):e58.
• 23: Van den Berg M. H., Schoones J. W., Vliet Vlieland, T. P. M. 2007. Internet-based physical activity interventions: a systematic review of the literature. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 9(3):e26.
• 24: Ware, L. J., Hurling R., Bataveljic, O., Fairley, B. W., Hurst, T. L., Murray, P., Rennie, K. L., Tomkins, C. E., Finn, A., Cobain, M. R., Pearson, D. A., Foreyt, J. P. 2008. Rates and determinants of uptake and use of an internet physical activity and weight management program in office and manufacturing work sites in England: cohort study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 10(4):e56.
• 25: Zhu, W. 2007. Promoting physical activity through internet: a persuasive technology view. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Persuasive Technology (Palo Alto, CA, USA, April 26-27 2007). PERSUASIVE 2007, LNCS 4744, 12--1.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  J. Computer Applications
  J.3 LIFE AND MEDICAL SCIENCES
      Subjects: Health

General Terms:
Experimentation, Human Factors, Measurement

Keywords:
behavior change, behavioral regulation, motivation, motives, persuasive technology, self-efficacy, tailored activity interventions