ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Designing empathic computers: the effect of multimodal empathic feedback using animated agent
Full text PdfPdf (525 KB)
Source ACM International Conference Proceeding Series; Vol. 350 archive
Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology table of contents
Claremont, California
SESSION: Persuasive design techniques table of contents
Article No. 7  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-376-1
Authors
Hien Nguyen  University of Aberdeen
Judith Masthoff  University of Aberdeen
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 29,   Downloads (12 Months): 68,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1541948.1541958
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Experiencing emotional distress is the number one reason why people who are undergoing behaviour modification (e.g. quitting smoking, dieting) suffer from relapses. Providing emotional support is an effective way to help them overcome the unpleasant effects of negative affect and adhere to their regimen. Building computers with such ability has grabbed the attention of the HCI community in recent years. Early research has shown some promising results when adopting strategies of how we comfort others, but many questions on how to build such systems remain unanswered. This paper presents the results of a 2 (modality: animated vs. no visual) by 3 (intervention: non-empathy vs. empathy vs. empathy and expressivity) between-subjects study that investigates the impact of two important factors and their interaction in the design of such systems: (1) different ways of expressing empathy, and (2) the modality of delivering such content. Findings and implications for the design of empathic computer systems are discussed and directions for future research are suggested.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
 
3
Klein, J., Moon, Y., Picard, R. 2002. This computer responds to user frustration: Theory, design, results, and implications. Interacting with Computers, 14, 119--140.
 
4
Vincent, S. 2005. Being Empathic: A Companion for Counsellors and Therapists. Radcliffe Publishing.
 
5
Stein, N. L., Hernandez. M. W. 2007. Assessing understanding and appraisals during emotional experience: The development and use of the narcoder. Handbook of Emotion Elicitation and Assessment. Oxford University Press.
 
6
Greene, J., Burleson, B. R. 2003. Handbook of Communication and Social Interaction Skills. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers.
 
7
Wilson, E., MacLeod, C., Campbell, L. 2007. The information-processing approach to emotion research. Handbook of Emotion Elicitation and Assessment. Oxford University Press.
 
8
Miller, W. R., Rollnick, S. 1991. Motivational Interviewing. The Guildford Press, New York.
9
 
10
Cahn, J. E. 1990. The generation of affect in synthesized speech. Journal of the American Voice I/O Society, 8, 1--19.
 
11
Nass, C., Foehr, U., Brave, S., Somoza, M. 2001. The effects of emotion of voice in synthesized and recorded speech. In Proceedings of the AAAI Symposium: Emotional and Intelligent II: The Tangled Knot of Social Cognition, North Falmouth, MA.
12
 
13
 
14
Thompson. E. R. 2007. Development and validation of an internationally reliable short-form of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38, 2, 227--242.
 
15
Forgas, J. P. 1995. Mood and judgment: the affect infusion model (AIM). Psychol Bull.
 
16
Forgas, J. P. 1985. Interpersonal behavior: The Psychology of Social Interaction. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Hien Nguyen: colleagues
Judith Masthoff: colleagues