ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Fixed-precision estimation of join selectivity
Full text PdfPdf (1.15 MB)
Source Symposium on Principles of Database Systems archive
Proceedings of the twelfth ACM SIGACT-SIGMOD-SIGART symposium on Principles of database systems table of contents
Washington, D.C., United States
Pages: 190 - 201  
Year of Publication: 1993
ISBN:0-89791-593-3
Authors
Sponsors
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
SIGART: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence
SIGMOD: ACM Special Interest Group on Management of Data
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 5,   Downloads (12 Months): 32,   Citation Count: 16
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/153850.153875
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We compare the performance of sampling-based procedures for estimation of the selectivity of an equijoin. While some of the procedures have been proposed in the database sampling literature, their relative performance has never been analyzed. A main result of this paper is a partial ordering that compares the variability of the estimators for the different procedures after an arbitrary fixed number of sampling steps. Prior to the current work, it was also unknown whether these fixed-step estimation procedures can be extended to asymptotically efficient fixed-precision estimation procedures. Our second main result is a general method for such an extension and a proof that the method is valid for all the estimation procedures under consideration. Finally, we show that, under reasonable assumptions on sampling costs, the partial ordering on the variability of the fixed-step estimation procedures implies a partial ordering on the cost of the corresponding fixed-precision estimation procedures. These results lead to a new algorithm for fixed-precision estimation of the selectivity of an equijoin. The algorithm appears to be the best available when there are no indices on the join key. Our results can be extended to general select-join queries.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Billingsley, P. (1986). Probability and Measure. Second Edition. John Wiley. New York.
 
2
Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling Techniques. Third Edition. John Wiley. New York.
 
3
 
4
Gut, A. (1988). Stopped Random Walks: Limit Theorems and Applications. Springer-Verlag. New York.
5
6
 
7
Hogan, M. (1983). Moments of the minimum of a random walk and complete convergence. Technical Report No. 21. Department of Statistics. Stanford University. Stanford, California.
8
9
10
 
11
12
13
 
14
 
15

CITED BY  16

Collaborative Colleagues:
Peter J. Haas: colleagues
Jeffrey F. Naughton: colleagues
S. Seshadri: colleagues
Arun N. Swami: colleagues