ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Complexity aspects of various semantics for disjunctive databases
Full text PdfPdf (860 KB)
Source Symposium on Principles of Database Systems archive
Proceedings of the twelfth ACM SIGACT-SIGMOD-SIGART symposium on Principles of database systems table of contents
Washington, D.C., United States
Pages: 158 - 167  
Year of Publication: 1993
ISBN:0-89791-593-3
Authors
Sponsors
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
SIGART: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence
SIGMOD: ACM Special Interest Group on Management of Data
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 3,   Downloads (12 Months): 14,   Citation Count: 8
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/153850.153864
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This paper addresses complexity issues for important problems arising with disjunctive databases. In particular, the complexity of inference of a literal and a formula from a propositional disjunctive database under a variety of well-known disjunctive database semantics is investigated, as well deciding whether a disjunctive database has a model under a particular semantics. The problems are located in appropriate slots of the polynomial hierarchy.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
 
3
M. Cadoli and M. Lenzerini. The Complexity of Closed World Reasoning and Circumscription. In Proceedings AAAI-90, pages 550-555, 1990.
 
4
M. Cadoli and M. Schaerf. A Survey on Complexity Results for Non-monotonic Logics. Technical report, Dipartimento di Informatica e Sistemistica, Universit#t di Roma "La Sapienza", 1992. Journal of Logic Programming, to appear.
 
5
E. Chart. A Possible Worlds Semantics for Disjunctive Databases. IEEE Transactions on Data and Knowledge Engineering, 1991. To appear.
 
6
A. Chandra and D. Harel. Horn Clause Queries and Generalizations. Journal of Logic Programming, 2:1- 15, 1985.
 
7
T. Eiter and G. Gottlob. Propositional Circumscription and Extended Closed World Reasoning are IIP- complete. Technical Report CD-TR 91/20, Christian Doppler Laboratory for Expert Systems, Vienna University of Technology, Austria, May 1991. To appear in Theoretical Computer Science.
 
8
T. Eiter and G. Gottlob. On the Computational Cost of Disjunctive Logic Programming: Propositional Case. Manuscript, March 1993.
 
9
 
10
M. Gelfond and V. Lifschitz. The Stable Model Semantics for Logic Programming. In Proceedings Fifth Logic Programming Symposium, pages 1070-1080, C#tmbridge Mass., 1988. MIT Press.
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
V. Lifschitz. Computing Circumscription. In Proceedings IJCAI-85, pages 121-127, 1985.
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
C. H. Papadimitriou and M. Yannakakis. The Complexity of Facets (And Some Facets of Complexity). Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 28:244-259, 1984.
 
19
T. Przymusinski. On the Declarative and Procedural Semantics of Stratified Deductive Databases. In Minker {17}, pages 193-216.
 
20
T. Przymusinski. Stable Semantics for Disjunctive Programs. New Generation Computing, 9:401-424, 1991.
 
21
 
22
R. Reiter. On Closed-World Databases. In H. Gallaire and J. Minker, editors, Logic and Data Bases, pages 55-76. Plenum Press, New York, 1978.
 
23
 
24
C. Sakama. Possible Model Semantics for Disjunctive Databases. In Proceedings 1st lntl. Conf. DOOD-89, pages 337-351, Kyoto Japan, 1989.
 
25
M. Schaerf. Logic Programming and Autoepistemic Logics: New Relations and Complexity Results. Submitted, December 1992.
26
 
27
J. Schlipf. A Survey of Complexity and Undecidability Results in Logic Programming. In H. Blair, W. Marek, A. Nerode, and J. Remmel, editors, lnfor. real Proceedings of the Workshop on Structural Gomplezity and Recursion-Theoretic Methods in Logic Pro- 9ramming, pages 93-102, Washington DC, November 13 1992. Cornell University, Mathematical Sciences institute.
 
28
29
 
30
A. Yahya and L. Henschen. Deduction in Non-Horn Databases. Journal o/ A utomated Reasoning, 1(2):141- 160, 1985.

CITED BY  8

Collaborative Colleagues:
Thomas Eiter: colleagues
Georg Gottlob: colleagues