Global software development: where are the benefits?

ABSTRACT

Introduction

Global Software Development (GSD) is increasingly becoming the normal practice in the software industry, readily evidenced by U.S. estimates that the value of the offshore software development market has increased 25-fold over the past 10 years, to the extent that one-quarter of U.S. spending on application development, integration and management services is expected to go off-shore according to recent predictions. There are many potential benefits that can arise from GSD. The most frequently cited one is that of reduced development costs due to the salary savings possible. Also, GSD can lead to reduced development duration due to greater time zone effectiveness as companies practice the so-called 'follow-the-sun' software development model. GSD also affords new opportunities for cross-site modularization of development work, potential access to a larger and better-skilled developer pool, and the possibility of greater innovation, learning and transfer of best practices. Finally, GSD can facilitate closer proximity to markets and customers.

However, GSD also introduces a number of challenges in relation to communication, coordination and control of the development process. These arise due to the distances involved in three dimensions -- geographical, temporal, and socio-cultural (See Figure 1). As a consequence, much research and practice has focused on trying to find ways to overcome the GSD challenges identified in Figure 1. In the literature to date, the potential benefits of GSD are usually just mentioned very briefly, if they are mentioned at all, and the realization of these benefits seems to be more or less taken for granted. The primary focus instead is on how the problems inherent in GSD might be addressed. Here, we reverse this trend and focus instead on the benefits and the extent to which they are actually being realized in practice in three global companies practicing GSD.

REFERENCES

• 1: Pär J. Ågerfalk , Brian Fitzgerald, Introduction, Communications of the ACM, v.49 n.10, October 2006 [doi>10.1145/1164394.1164416]
• 2: Bass, M. and Paulish, D. Global software development process research at Siemens, In Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Global Software Development, 11--14, <gsd2004.cs.uvic.ca/docs/proceedings.pdf>
• 3: Erran Carmel, Global software teams: collaborating across borders and time zones, Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1999
• 4: Erran Carmel , Ritu Agarwal, Tactical Approaches for Alleviating Distance in Global Software Development, IEEE Software, v.18 n.2, p.22-29, March 2001 [doi>10.1109/52.914734]
• 5: Daniela Damian , Filippo Lanubile , Heather L. Oppenheimer, Addressing the challenges of software industry globalization: the workshop on Global Software Development, Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Software Engineering, May 03-10, 2003, Portland, Oregon
• 6: Christof Ebert , Philip De Neve, Surviving Global Software Development, IEEE Software, v.18 n.2, p.62-69, March 2001 [doi>10.1109/52.914748]
• 7: Rebecca E. Grinter , James D. Herbsleb , Dewayne E. Perry, The geography of coordination: dealing with distance in R&D work, Proceedings of the international ACM SIGGROUP conference on Supporting group work, p.306-315, November 14-17, 1999, Phoenix, Arizona, United States [doi>10.1145/320297.320333]
• 8: James D. Herbsleb , Rebecca E. Grinter, Splitting the organization and integrating the code: Conway's law revisited, Proceedings of the 21st international conference on Software engineering, p.85-95, May 16-22, 1999, Los Angeles, California, United States [doi>10.1145/302405.302455]
• 9: James D. Herbsleb , Audris Mockus , Thomas A. Finholt , Rebecca E. Grinter, Distance, dependencies, and delay in a global collaboration, Proceedings of the 2000 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, p.319-328, December 2000, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States [doi>10.1145/358916.359003]
• 10: Kjetil Molkken , Magne Jrgensen, A Review of Surveys on Software Effort Estimation, Proceedings of the 2003 International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering, p.223, September 30-October 01, 2003
• 11: D. L. Parnas, On the criteria to be used in decomposing systems into modules, Communications of the ACM, v.15 n.12, p.1053-1058, Dec. 1972 [doi>10.1145/361598.361623]
• 12: Sundeep Sahay, Global software alliances: the challenge of 'standardization', Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, v.15 n.1, p.3-21, 01/01/2003

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  D. Software
  D.2 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
      D.2.9 Management

Additional Classification:
  K. Computing Milieux
  K.6 MANAGEMENT OF COMPUTING AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS
      K.6.4 System Management