ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
A new approach to auctions and resilient mechanism design
Full text PdfPdf (500 KB)
Source
Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing archive
Proceedings of the 41st annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing table of contents
Bethesda, MD, USA
SESSION: Economics table of contents
Pages 503-512  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-506-2
Authors
Jing Chen  CSAIL, MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA
Silvio Micali  CSAIL, MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA
Sponsors
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 46,   Downloads (12 Months): 99,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1536414.1536484
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We put forward a new approach to mechanism design, and exemplify it via a new mechanism guaranteeing significant revenue in unrestricted combinatorial auctions. Our mechanism (1) succeeds in a new and very adversarial collusion model; (2) works in a new, equilibrium-less, and very strong solution concept; (3) benchmarks its performance against the knowledge that the players have about each other; (4) is computationally efficient and preserves the players' privacy to an unusual extent.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
L.M. Ausubel and P. Milgrom. The Lovely but Lonely Vickrey Auction. Combinatorial Auctions, MIT Press, pp. 17--40, 2006.
2
 
3
M.F. Balcan, A. Blum, and Y. Mansour. Single Price Mechanisms for Revenue Maximization in Unlimited Supply Combinatorial Auctions. CMU-CS-07-111.
 
4
E.H. Clarke. Multipart Pricing of Public Goods. Public Choice, Vol.11, No.1, pp. 17--33, Sep., 1971.
 
5
J. Cremer and R.P. McLean. Full Extraction of the Surplus in Bayesian and Dominant Strategy Auctions. Econometrica, Vol.56, No.6, pp. 1247--1257, Nov., 1988.
6
 
7
 
8
A. Goldberg, J. Hartline, A. Karlin, M. Saks, and A. Wright. Competitive Auctions. Games and Economic Behavior, Vol. 55, Issue 2, pp. 242--269, May, 2006.
 
9
T. Groves. Incentives in Teams. Econometrica, Vol. 41, No. 4, pp. 617--631, 1973.
 
10
 
11
S. Izmalkov, M. Lepinski, and S. Micali. Perfect Implementation of Normal-Form Mechanisms. FOCS 2005, pp. 585--595. Also: MIT-CSAIL-TR-2008-028.
 
12
M. Jackson. Implementation in Undominated Strategies: a Look at Bounded Mechanisms. Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 59, No. 201, pp. 757--775, 1992.
13
14
 
15
A. Likhodedov and T. Sandholm. Approximating Revenue-Maximizing Combinatorial Auctions. AAAI 2005, pp. 267--274.
 
16
S. Micali and P. Valiant. Resilient Mechanisms for Unrestricted Combinatorial Auctions. Available at http://people.csail.mit.edu/silvio/Selected Scientific Papers/Mechanism Design.
 
17
H. Moulin and S. Shenker. Strategyproof Sharing of Submodular Costs: Budget Balance Versus Efficiency. Economic Theory, Vol.18, No.3, pp. 511--533, 2001.
 
18
W. Vickrey. Counterspeculation, Auctions, and Competitive Sealed Tenders. The Journal of Finance, Vol. 16, No. 1, pages 8--37, Mar., 1961.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Jing Chen: colleagues
Silvio Micali: colleagues