ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
On the complexity of differentially private data release: efficient algorithms and hardness results
Full text PdfPdf (533 KB)
Source
Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing archive
Proceedings of the 41st annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing table of contents
Bethesda, MD, USA
SESSION: Privacy table of contents
Pages 381-390  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-506-2
Authors
Cynthia Dwork  Microsoft Research SVC, Mountain View, CA, USA
Moni Naor  Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
Omer Reingold  Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
Guy N. Rothblum  MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA
Salil Vadhan  Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
Sponsors
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 31,   Downloads (12 Months): 102,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1536414.1536467
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We consider private data analysis in the setting in which a trusted and trustworthy curator, having obtained a large data set containing private information, releases to the public a "sanitization" of the data set that simultaneously protects the privacy of the individual contributors of data and offers utility to the data analyst. The sanitization may be in the form of an arbitrary data structure, accompanied by a computational procedure for determining approximate answers to queries on the original data set, or it may be a "synthetic data set" consisting of data items drawn from the same universe as items in the original data set; queries are carried out as if the synthetic data set were the actual input. In either case the process is non-interactive; once the sanitization has been released the original data and the curator play no further role.

For the task of sanitizing with a synthetic dataset output, we map the boundary between computational feasibility and infeasibility with respect to a variety of utility measures. For the (potentially easier) task of sanitizing with unrestricted output format, we show a tight qualitative and quantitative connection between hardness of sanitizing and the existence of traitor tracing schemes.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
2
 
3
D. Boneh, A. Sahai, and B. Waters. Fully collusion resistant traitor tracing with short ciphertexts and private keys. In EUROCRYPT, pages 573--592, 2006.
 
4
5
 
6
C. Dwork, F. McSherry, K. Nissim, and A. Smith. Calibrating noise to sensitivity in private data analysis. In S. Halevy and T. Rabin, editors, First Theory of Cryptography Conference (TCC), volume 3876, pages 265--284. Springer-Verlag, 2006.
7
 
8
C. Dwork and K. Nissim. Privacy-preserving datamining on vertically partitioned databases. In CRYPTO, pages 528--544, 2004.
 
9
10
 
11
12
 
13
S. Goldwasser and S. Micali. Probabilistic encryption. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 28(2):270--299, 1984.
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
20

Collaborative Colleagues:
Cynthia Dwork: colleagues
Moni Naor: colleagues
Omer Reingold: colleagues
Guy N. Rothblum: colleagues
Salil Vadhan: colleagues