ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Private coresets
Full text PdfPdf (579 KB)
Source
Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing archive
Proceedings of the 41st annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing table of contents
Bethesda, MD, USA
SESSION: Privacy table of contents
Pages 361-370  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-506-2
Authors
Dan Feldman  Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
Amos Fiat  Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
Haim Kaplan  Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
Kobbi Nissim  Ben-Gurion University, Be'er Sheva, Israel
Sponsors
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 32,   Downloads (12 Months): 152,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1536414.1536465
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

A coreset of a point set P is a small weighted set of points that captures some geometric properties of $P$. Coresets have found use in a vast host of geometric settings. We forge a link between coresets, and differentially private sanitizations that can answer any number of queries without compromising privacy. We define the notion of private coresets, which are simultaneously both coresets and differentially private, and show how they may be constructed. We first show that the existence of a small coreset with low generalized sensitivity (i.e., replacing a single point in the original point set slightly affects the quality of the coreset) implies (in an inefficient manner) the existence of a private coreset for the same queries. This greatly extends the works of Blum, Ligett, and Roth [STOC 2008] and McSherry and Talwar [FOCS 2007]. We also give an efficient algorithm to compute private coresets for k-median and k-mean queries in Red, immediately implying efficient differentially private sanitizations for such queries. Following McSherry and Talwar, this construction also gives efficient coalition proof (approximately dominant strategy) mechanisms for location problems. Unlike coresets which only have a multiplicative approximation factor, we prove that private coresets must have an additive error. We present a new technique for showing lower bounds on this error.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
P. Agarwal, S. Har-Peled, and K.R. Varadarajan. Geometric approximations via coresets. Combinatorial and Computational Geometry -- MSRI Publications, 52:1--30, 2005.
2
 
3
4
5
 
6
7
8
 
9
L.S. Buriol, G. Frahling, S. Leonardi, and C. Sohler. Estimating clustering indexes in data streams. ESA, pages 618--632, 2007.
10
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
15
 
16
C. Dwork. Differential privacy. ICALP, LNCS, pages 1--12, 2006.
 
17
C. Dwork, K. Kenthapadi, F. McSherry, I. Mironov, and M. Naor. Our data, ourselves: Privacy via distributed noise generation. EUROCRYPT, LNCS, pages 486--503. Springer, 2006.
 
18
C. Dwork, F. McSherry, K. Nissim, and A. Smith. Calibrating noise to sensitivity in private data analysis. TCC, pages 265--284, 2006.
19
 
20
C. Dwork and K .Nissim. Privacy-preserving datamining on vertically partitioned databases. CRYPTO, pages 528--544, 2004.
 
21
22
 
23
24
25
 
26
G. Frahling, P. Indyk, and C. Sohler. Sampling in dynamic data streams and applications. Int. J. Comput. Geometry Appl, 18(1/2):3--28, 2008.
27
 
28
R. L. Graham and N. J. A. Sloane. Lower bounds for constant weight codes. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, 26(1):37--43, 1980.
 
29
 
30
S. Har-Peled. No coreset, no cry. FSTTCS, pages 324--335, 2004.
31
32
 
33
34
 
35
 
36
 
37
38
 
39
K. Nissim. Private data analysis via output perturbation. In Charu Aggarwal and Philip S. Yu, editors, Privacy-Preserving Data Mining, Models and Algorithms, pages 383--414.
40
 
41


Collaborative Colleagues:
Dan Feldman: colleagues
Amos Fiat: colleagues
Haim Kaplan: colleagues
Kobbi Nissim: colleagues