ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Integrality gaps for Sherali-Adams relaxations
Full text PdfPdf (523 KB)
Source
Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing archive
Proceedings of the 41st annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing table of contents
Bethesda, MD, USA
SESSION: Optimization table of contents
Pages 283-292  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-506-2
Authors
Moses Charikar  Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
Konstantin Makarychev  IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY, USA
Yury Makarychev  Microsoft Research New England, Cambridge, MA, USA
Sponsors
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 10,   Downloads (12 Months): 63,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1536414.1536455
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We prove strong lower bounds on integrality gaps of Sherali-Adams relaxations for MAX CUT, Vertex Cover, Sparsest Cut and other problems. Our constructions show gaps for Sherali-Adams relaxations that survive nδ rounds of lift and project. For MAX CUT and Vertex Cover, these show that even nδ rounds of Sherali-Adams do not yield a better than 2-ε approximation. The main combinatorial challenge in constructing these gap examples is the construction of a fractional solution that is far from an integer solution, but yet admits consistent distributions of local solutions for all small subsets of variables. Satisfying this consistency requirement is one of the major hurdles to constructing Sherali-Adams gap examples. We present a modular recipe for achieving this, building on previous work on metrics with a local-global structure. We develop a conceptually simple geometric approach to constructing Sherali-Adams gap examples via constructions of consistent local SDP solutions. This geometric approach is surprisingly versatile. We construct Sherali-Adams gap examples for Unique Games based on our construction for MAX CUT together with a parallel repetition like procedure. This in turn allows us to obtain Sherali-Adams gap examples for any problem that has a Unique Games based hardness result (with some additional conditions on the reduction from Unique Games). Using this, we construct 2-ε gap examples for Maximum Acyclic Subgraph that rules out any family of linear constraints with support at most nδ.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
S. Arora, B. Bollobás, L. Lovász, and I. Tourlakis. Proving Integrality Gaps without Knowing the Linear Program. Theory of Computing, vol. 2, pp. 19--51, 2006.
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
8
 
9
. Grötschel, M. Jünger, and G. Reinelt, A cutting plane algorithm for the linear ordering problem. Operations Research 32 (1984), pp. 1195--1220.
 
10
. Grötschel, M. Jünger, and G. Reinelt, On the acyclic subgraph polytope. Mathematical Programming, 32 (1985), pp. 28--42.
 
11
. Grötschel, M. Jünger, and G. Reinelt, Facets of the linear ordering polytope. Mathematical Programming, 32 (1985), pp. 43--60.
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
L. Lovász and A. Schrijver. Cones of matrices and set-functions and 0-1 optimization. SIAM Journal on Optimization, vol. 1, pp. 166--190, 1991. SIAM J. Optim., vol. 1, pp. 166--190, 1991.
 
16
 
17
18
 
19
 
20


Collaborative Colleagues:
Moses Charikar: colleagues
Konstantin Makarychev: colleagues
Yury Makarychev: colleagues