ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
A unified framework for concurrent security: universal composability from stand-alone non-malleability
Full text PdfPdf (522 KB)
Source
Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing archive
Proceedings of the 41st annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing table of contents
Bethesda, MD, USA
SESSION: Crypto I table of contents
Pages 179-188  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-506-2
Authors
Huijia Lin  Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
Rafael Pass  Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
Muthuramakrishnan Venkitasubramaniam  Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
Sponsors
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 26,   Downloads (12 Months): 120,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1536414.1536441
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We present a unified framework for obtaining Universally Composable (UC) protocols by relying on stand-alone secure non-malleable commitments. Essentially all results on concurrent secure computation--both in relaxed models (e.g., quasi-polynomial time simulation), or with trusted set-up assumptions (e.g., the CRS model, the imperfect CRS model, or the timing model)--are obtained as special cases of our framework. This not only leads to conceptually simpler solutions, but also to improved set-up assumptions, round-complexity, and computational assumptions.

Additionally, this framework allows us to consider new relaxed models of security: we show that UC security where the adversary is a uniform PPT but the simulator is allowed to be a non-uniform PPT (i.e., essentially, traditional UC security, but with a non-uniform reduction) is possible without any trusted set-up. This gives the first results on concurrent secure computation without set-up, which can be used for securely computing "computationally-sensitive" functionalities (e.g., data-base queries, "proof of work"-protocols, or playing bridge on the Internet).


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
B. Barak and R. Pass. On the Possibility of One-Message Weak Zero-Knowledge. In TCC 2004, pages 121--132.
 
6
 
7
 
8
R. Canetti. Security and Composition of Multiparty Cryptographic Protocols. Jour. of Cryptology, 13(1):143--202, 2000.
 
9
R. Canetti. Obtaining Universally Composable Security: Towards the Bare Bones of Trust. In Asiacrypt, pages 88--112, 2007.
 
10
 
11
 
12
R. Canetti, E. Kushilevitz and Y. Lindell. On the Limitations of Universally Composable Two-Party Computation Without Set-Up Assumptions. In Eurocrypt2003, Springer LNCS 2656, pages 68--86, 2003.
 
13
R. Canetti, Y. Dodis, R. Pass, S. Walfish. Universally Composable Security with Global Setup. In 4th TCC, 2007
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
19
 
20
A. Feige and A. Shamir. How to Prove Yourself: Practical Solutions to Identification and Signature Problems. In Crypto86, Springer LNCS 263, pages 181--187, 1987.
 
21
 
22
O. Goldreich and A. Kahan. How to Construct Constant-Round Zero-Knowledge Proof Systems for NP. Jour. of Cryptology, Vol. 9, No. 2, pages 167--189, 1996.
23
24
 
25
 
26
S. Goldwasser, S. Micali. Probabilistic Encryption. JCSS 28(2), pages 270--299, 1984.
 
27
 
28
J. Groth and R. Ostrovsky. Cryptography in the Multi-string Model. In CRYPTO 2007, pages 323--341, 2007.
 
29
 
30
J. Katz, R. Ostrovsky and A. Smith. Round Efficiency of Multi-Party Computation with a Dishonest Majority, In EuroCrypt2003. Springer LNCS 2656 pages 578--595, 2003.
31
 
32
H. Lin, R. Pass, and M. Venkitasubramaniam. Concurrent Non-Malleable Commitments from One-way Functions. In TCC 2008, pages 571--588, 2008.
33
34
 
35
 
36
37
 
38
 
39
 
40
R. Ostrovksy, G. Persiano, I. Visconti. Concurrent Non-Malleable Witness Indistinguishability and its applications. http://eccc.hpi-web.de/eccc-reports/2006/TR06-095/ .
 
41
R. Pass. Simulation in Quasi-Polynomial Time and Its Application to Protocol Composition. In EuroCrypt2003, Springer LNCS 2656, pages 160--176, 2003.
42
 
43
 
44
45
 
46
47
 
48
 
49
 
50


Collaborative Colleagues:
Huijia Lin: colleagues
Rafael Pass: colleagues
Muthuramakrishnan Venkitasubramaniam: colleagues