ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Green's conjecture and testing linear-invariant properties
Full text PdfPdf (480 KB)
Source
Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing archive
Proceedings of the 41st annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing table of contents
Bethesda, MD, USA
SESSION: Property testing table of contents
Pages 159-166  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-506-2
Author
Asaf Shapira  Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA
Sponsors
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 8,   Downloads (12 Months): 75,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1536414.1536438
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Given a set of linear equations Mx=b, we say that a set of integers S is (M,b)-free if it contains no solution to this system of equations. Motivated by questions related to testing linear-invariant properties of boolean functions, as well as recent investigations in additive number theory, the following conjecture was raised (implicitly) by Green and by Bhattacharyya, Chen, Sudan and Xie: we say that a set of integers S ⊆ [n], is ε-far from being (M,b)-free if one needs to remove at least ε n elements from S in order to make it (M,b)-free. The above conjecture states that for any system of homogenous linear equations Mx=0 and for any ε >0 there is a constant time algorithm that can distinguish with high probability between sets of integers that are (M,0)-free from sets that are ε-far from being (M,0)-free. Or in other words, that for any M there is an efficient testing algorithm for the property of being (M,0)-free. In this paper we confirm the above conjecture by showing that such a testing algorithm exists even for non-homogenous linear equations. As opposed to most results on testing boolean functions, which rely on algebraic and analytic arguments, our proof relies on results from extremal hypergraph theory, such as the recent removal lemmas of Gowers, Rodl et al. and Austin and Tao.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
 
3
N. Alon, E. Fischer, M. Krivelevich and M. Szegedy, Efficient testing of large graphs, Proc. of 40th FOCS, New York, NY, IEEE(1999), 656--666. Also: Combinatorica 20 (2000), 451--476.
4
 
5
N. Alon, T. Kaufman, M. Krivelevich, S. Litsyn and D. Ron, Testing low-degree polynomials over GF(2), Proc. of RANDOM 2003, 188--199.
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
T. Austin and T. Tao, On the testability and repair of hereditary hypergraph properties, manuscript, 2008.
 
11
 
12
F. A. Behrend, On sets of integers which contain no three terms in arithmetic progression, Proc. National Academy of Sciences USA 32(1946), 331--332.
 
13
 
14
A. Bhattacharyya, V. Chen, M. Sudan and N. Xie, Testing linear-invariant non-linear properties, Electronic Colloquium on Computational Complexity, Report TR08--088, 2008.
 
15
 
16
 
17
P. Candela, On systems of linear equations and uniform hypergraphs, manuscript, 2008.
 
18
A. Czumaj and C. Sohler, Sublinear-time algorithms, Bulletin of the EATCS, 89 (2006) 23--47.
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
H. Furstenberg and Y. Katznelson, An ergodic Szemerédi theorem for commuting transformations, J. Analyse Math. 34 (1978), 275--291.
 
23
24
 
25
T. Gowers, Hypergraph regularity and the multidimensional Szemerédi theorem, Ann. of Math. Volume 166, Number 3 (2007),897--946.
 
26
 
27
B. Green, A Szemerédi-type regularity lemma in a belian groups, GAFA 15 (2005), 340--376.
 
28
Y. Ishigami, A simple regularization of hypergraphs, available athttp://arxiv.org/abs/math/0612838.
 
29
 
30
 
31
32
 
33
Y. Kohayakawa, B. Nagle, V. Rödl, M. Schacht and J. Skokan, The hypergraph regularity method and its applications, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 102(23): 8109--8113.
 
34
J. Komlós and M. Simonovits, Szemerédi's Regularity Lemma andits applications in graph theory. In: Combinatorics, PaulErdös is Eighty, Vol II (D. Miklós, V. T. Sós, T. Szönyieds.), János Bolyai Math. Soc., Budapest (1996), 295--352.
 
35
D. Král', O. Serra and L. Vena, A combinatorial proof of theremoval lemma for groups, arXiv:0804.4847v1.
 
36
D. Král', O. Serra and L. Vena, A removal lemma for linear systems over finite fields, Jornadas de Matematica Discreta y algortimica, 2008.
 
37
 
38
 
39
 
40
K.F. Roth, On certain sets of integers, J. London Math. Soc. 28 (1953), 104--109.
 
41
 
42
I. Z. Ruzsa, Solving a linear equation in a set of integers I, Acta Arithmetica 65 (1993), 259--282.
 
43
I. Ruzsa and E. Szemerédi, Triple systems with no six points carrying three triangles, in Combinatorics (Keszthely, 1976), Coll.Math. Soc. J. Bolyai 18, Volume II, 939--945.
 
44
E. Szemerédi, Integer sets containing no k elements in arithmetic progression, Acta Arith. 27 (1975), 299--345.
 
45
. Szemerédi,Regular partitions of graphs, In: Proc. Colloque Inter. CNRS (J. C. Bermond, J. C. Fournier, M. Las Vergnas andD. Sotteau, eds.), 1978, 399--401.
 
46