ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
New direct-product testers and 2-query PCPs
Full text PdfPdf (551 KB)
Source
Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing archive
Proceedings of the 41st annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing table of contents
Bethesda, MD, USA
SESSION: Property testing table of contents
Pages 131-140  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-506-2
Authors
Russell Impagliazzo  Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, NJ, USA
Valentine Kabanets  Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada
Avi Wigderson  Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, NJ, USA
Sponsors
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 12,   Downloads (12 Months): 60,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1536414.1536435
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The "direct product code" of a function f gives its values on all k-tuples (f(x1),...,f(xk)). This basic construct underlies "hardness amplification" in cryptography, circuit complexity and PCPs. Goldreich and Safra [12] pioneered its local testing and its PCP application. A recent result by Dinur and Goldenberg [5] enabled for the first time testing proximity to this important code in the "list-decoding" regime. In particular, they give a 2-query test which works for polynomially small success probability 1/kα, and show that no such test works below success probability 1/k. Our main result is a 3-query test which works for exponentially small success probability exp(-kα). Our techniques (based on recent simplified decoding algorithms for the same code [15]) also allow us to considerably simplify the analysis of the 2-query test of [5]. We then show how to derandomize their test, achieving a code of polynomial rate, independent of k, and success probability 1/kα. Finally we show the applicability of the new tests to PCPs. Starting with a 2-query PCP over an alphabet Σ and with soundness error 1-δ, Rao [19] (building on Raz's (k-fold) parallel repetition theorem [20] and Holenstein's proof [13]) obtains a new 2-query PCP over the alphabet Σk with soundness error exp(-δ2 k). Our techniques yield a 2-query PCP with soundness error exp(-δ √k). Our PCP construction turns out to be essentially the same as the miss-match proof system defined and analyzed by Feige and Kilian [8], but with simpler analysis and exponentially better soundness error.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
2
3
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
10
 
11
O. Goldreich, N. Nisan, and A. Wigderson. On Yao's XOR-Lemma. ECCC, TR95-050, 1995.
 
12
13
 
14
15
16
 
17
 
18
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24

Collaborative Colleagues:
Russell Impagliazzo: colleagues
Valentine Kabanets: colleagues
Avi Wigderson: colleagues