ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
PD and joint application design: a transatlantic comparison
Full text PdfPdf (3.29 MB)
Source
Communications of the ACM archive
Volume 36 ,  Issue 6  (June 1993) table of contents
Special issue on graphical user interfaces: the next generation
Pages: 40 - 48  
Year of Publication: 1993
ISSN:0001-0782
Authors
Erran Carmel  American Univ., Washington, DC
Randall D. Whitaker  Umea Univ., Umea, Sweden
Joey F. George  Univ. of Arizona, Tucson
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 17,   Downloads (12 Months): 176,   Citation Count: 35
Additional Information:

references   cited by   index terms   review   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/153571.163265
What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
5
 
6
Crawford, T. People considerations for a more successful J AD. Am. Program. 4 (jan. 1991).
 
7
Czyzewski, P., johnson, J. and Roberts, E. Introduction: Purpose of PDC-90. In Proceedings of Conference on Participatm? Design, PDC'90 (:Seattle, 1990) Palo Alto, Calif., Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility.
 
8
EDP Analyzer. Developing high quality systems faster. Vol 24, 6 (June 1986),
 
9
Ehn, P. Speech at Conference on Pat'ticipatory Design, PDC'90 (Seattle, Wash., 1990). Author's notes.
 
10
 
11
Floyd, C., MehI, W., Reisen, F., Schmidt, G. and Woff~ G. 'Out of Scandinavia: Alternative approaches to software design and system development. Human-Comput. Inter. 4 (!989), 253-350.
 
12
Greenbaum, J. Panel presentation, Conference on Participato~ Design PDC'90, (Seattle, Wash., 1:990). Author's notes.
 
13
 
14
Guide Joint application design, Guide International Inc., GPP-147. Chicago, IL, 1986.
 
15
Hirschheim, R.A. and Newman, M. Symbolism and information systems development: Myth, metaphor and magic. Inf. Syst. Res. 2, 1 (Mar. 1991), 29-62.
 
16
Ives, B. and Olson, M. User involvement and MIS success: A review of research. Manage. Sci. 30:(1984), 586- 603.
 
17
 
18
Kensing, F. and Munk-Madsen, A. Participatory design: Structure in a toolbox. In Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference, PDC'92. (Cambridge, Mass., Nov. I992).
 
19
20
21
 
22
 
23
Mumford, E. Participative systems design: A structure and method. Syst. Object. Solutions 1, i (1981), 5-19.
 
24
Rush, G. A fast way to define system requirements. Computerworld (Oct. 7, 1985), 11-12.
 
25
Whitaker, R., Essler, U. and Oestberg, O. Part.kipatory business modeling. Lu!e~t Technical University (Sweden), TULEA Report 1991: 31~
 
26
 
27

CITED BY  35


REVIEW

"Charles Kenneth Davis : Reviewer"

The practical implementation of two well-known design methodologies—Joint Application Design (JAD) and Participatory Design (PD)—is considered. Both methodologies seek to operationalize the abstract notions of user involvement and   more...

Collaborative Colleagues:
Erran Carmel: colleagues
Randall D. Whitaker: colleagues
Joey F. George: colleagues