ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Automating analysis of large-scale botnet probing events
Full text PdfPdf (839 KB)
Source
ASIAN ACM Symposium on Information, Computer and Communications Security archive
Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Information, Computer, and Communications Security table of contents
Sydney, Australia
SESSION: Network security-I table of contents
Pages 11-22  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-394-5
Authors
Zhichun Li  Northwestern University, Evanston, IL
Anup Goyal  Northwestern University, Evanston, IL
Yan Chen  Northwestern University, Evanston, IL
Vern Paxson  UC Berkeley & ICSI, Berkeley, CA
Sponsor
SIGSAC: ACM Special Interest Group on Security, Audit, and Control
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 44,   Downloads (12 Months): 179,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1533057.1533063
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Botnets dominate today's attack landscape. In this work we investigate ways to analyze collections of malicious probing traffic in order to understand the significance of large-scale "botnet probes". In such events, an entire collection of remote hosts together probes the address space monitored by a sensor in some sort of coordinated fashion. Our goal is to develop methodologies by which sites receiving such probes can infer---using purely local observation---information about the probing activity: What scanning strategies does the probing employ? Is this an attack that specifically targets the site, or is the site only incidentally probed as part of a larger, indiscriminant attack?

Our analysis draws upon extensive honeynet data to explore the prevalence of different types of scanning, including properties such as trend, uniformity, coordination, and darknet avoidance. In addition, we design schemes to extrapolate the global properties of scanning events (e.g., total population and target scope) as inferred from the limited local view of a honeynet. Cross-validating with data from DShield shows that our inferences exhibit promising accuracy.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
AP Market Sharing. http://news.com.com/Microsofts+Wi-Fi+ups+and+downs/2100--1039_3--994518.
 
2
HoneyBow Sensor. http://honeybow.mwcollect.org.
 
3
Honeysnap. http://www.honeynet.org/tools/honeysnap/index.html.
 
4
Net-Worm.Win32.Allaple.a. http://www.viruslist.com/en/viruses/encyclopedia?virusid=145521.
 
5
OS Platform Statistics by W3school. http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.asp.
 
6
Bacher, P., Holz, T., Kotter, M., and Wicherski, G. Know your Enemy: Tracking Botnets. http://www.honeynet.org/papers/bots.
 
7
Barford, P., et al. An inside look at botnets. In Series: Advances in Information Security. Springer, 2006.
8
 
9
 
10
Cai, J., et al. Honeynets and honeygames: A game theoretic approach to defending network monitors. Tech. Rep. TR1577, University of Wiscconsin, 2006.
 
11
 
12
 
13
Gu, G., Zhang, J., and Lee, W. Botsniffer: Detecting botnet command and control channels in network traffic. In Proc. of NDSS (2008).
14
 
15
Kendall, M. G. Rank Correlation Methods. Griffin., 1976.
 
16
 
17
Li, Z., Goyal, A., Chen, Y., and Kuzmanovic, A. P2p doctor: Measurement and diagnosis of misconfigured peer-to-peer traffic. Tech. Rep. NWU-EECS-07-06, Northwestern University, 2007.
 
18
Li, Z., Goyal, A., Chen, Y., and Paxson, V. Towards situational awareness of large-scale botnet events using honeynets. Tech. Rep. NWU-EECS-08-08, Northwestern University, 2008.
 
19
Manna, P., Chen, S., and Ranka, S. Exact modeling of propagation for permutation-scanning worms. In IEEE INFOCOM (2008).
 
20
21
 
22
 
23
24
25
 
26
Rice, J. A. Mathematical Statistics and Data Analysis. Duxbury Press, 1994.
 
27
SANS Institute. Dshield. org: Distributed intrusion detection system. http://www.dshield.org/.
 
28
 
29
Weisstein, W. E. Stirling Number of the Second Kind. http://mathworld.wolfram.com/StirlingNumberoftheSecondKind.html.
 
30
Yegneswaran, V., Barford, P., and Paxson, V. Using honeynets for internet situational awareness. In In Proc. of ACM Hotnets IV (2005).
31

Collaborative Colleagues:
Zhichun Li: colleagues
Anup Goyal: colleagues
Yan Chen: colleagues
Vern Paxson: colleagues