ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Nullification test collections for web spam and SEO
Full text PdfPdf (728 KB)
Source ACM International Conference Proceeding Series archive
Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Adversarial Information Retrieval on the Web table of contents
Madrid, Spain
SESSION: Spam research collections table of contents
Pages 53-60  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-438-6
Authors
Timothy Jones  The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
Ramesh Sankaranarayana  The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
David Hawking  Funnelback Pty Ltd, Canberra, Australia
Nick Craswell  Microsoft Research, Cambridge, UK
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 26,   Downloads (12 Months): 70,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1531914.1531927
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Research in the area of adversarial information retrieval has been facilitated by the availability of the UK-2006/UK-2007 collections, comprising crawl data, link graph, and spam labels. However, research into nullifying the negative effect of spam or excessive search engine optimisation (SEO) on the ranking of non-spam pages is not well supported by these resources. Nor is the study of cloaking techniques or of click spam. Finally, the domain-restricted nature of a .uk crawl means that only parts of link-farm icebergs may be visible in these crawls. We introduce the term nullification which we define as "preventing problem pages from negatively affecting search results". We show some important differences between properties of current .uk-restricted crawls and those previously reported for the Web as a whole. We identify a need for an adversarial IR collection which is not domain-restricted and which is supported by a set of appropriate query sets and (optimistically) user-behaviour data. The billion-page unrestricted crawl being conducted by CMU (web09-bst) and which will be used in the 2009 TREC Web Track is assessed as a possible basis for a new AIR test collection. We discuss the pros and cons of its scale, and the feasibility of adding resources such as query lists to enhance the utility of the collection for AIR research.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
2
 
3
4
 
5
6
7
8
 
9
J. Callan, M. Hoy, C. Yoo, and L. Zhao. web08-bst.v1 web data collection, 2008. http://boston.lti.cs.cmu.edu/callan/Data/#Web.
10
 
11
K. Chellapilla and D. M. Chickering. Improving cloaking detection using search query popularity and monetizability. In Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Adversarial Information Retrieval on the Web (AIRWeb), pages 17--24, Seattle, WA, August 2006.
12
 
13
G. Culliss. User popularity ranked search engines, 1999. http://web.archive.org/web/20000302121422/http://www.infonortics.com/searchengines/boston1999/culliss/index.htm.
14
 
15
Z. Gyöngyi and H. Garcia-Molina. Web spam taxonomy. In Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Adversarial Information Retrieval on the Web (AIRWeb), 2005.
 
16
 
17
D. Hawking and N. Craswell. The very large collection and web tracks. In E. Voorhees and D. Harman, editors, TREC: Experiment and Evaluation in Information Retrieval. MIT Press, 2005. http://es.csiro.au/pubs/trecbook_for_website.pdf (ISBN 0262220733).
 
18
D. Hawking, T. Rowlands, and M. Adcock. Improving rankings in small-scale web search using click-implied descriptions. In P. Bruza, A. Spink, and R. Wilkinson, editors, Proceedings of ADCS 2006, pages 17--24, Brisbane, December 2006.
19
 
20
T. Jones, D. Hawking, and R. Sankaranarayana. A framework for measuring the impact of web spam. In Proceedings of ADCS 2007, December 2007.
21
 
22
V. Krishnan and R. Raj. Web spam detection with anti-trust rank. In Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Adversarial Information Retrieval on the Web (AIRWeb), pages 37--40, 2006.
 
23
 
24
G. Mishne. Blocking blog spam with language model disagreement. In In Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Adversarial Information Retrieval on the Web (AIRWeb), 2005.
 
25
L. Page, S. Brin, R. Motwani, and T. Winograd. The pagerank citation ranking: Bringing order to the web. Technical report, Stanford, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, January 1998. dbpubs.stanford.edu:8090/pub/1999-66.
26
27
 
28
X. Shen. Chronicle of aol search query log release incident, 2009. http://sifaka.cs.uiuc.edu/xshen/aol_querylog.html.
29
30
31
32

Collaborative Colleagues:
Timothy Jones: colleagues
Ramesh Sankaranarayana: colleagues
David Hawking: colleagues
Nick Craswell: colleagues