Open innovation and the solver community

ABSTRACT

This paper introduces a doctoral research on open innovation solver's behavior and group factors inducing it. The research is now finishing its first year and exploratory strategies are developed close to open innovation online communities, to prepare a systematic methodological approach.

Research seeks to understand how solver's patterns of communication and group behavior influence their participation in an open innovation community, through collaborative IT platforms - and how it weights on their innovation production. A second question is about critical factors that influence solvers' participation, due to the present global economical crisis. By designing a model of the solver's group of belonging characteristics and reflecting that on a collaborative platform's functionalities, the project intends to present some propositions to ease participation in crowdsourcing innovation processes - through an online platform being designed and developed at University of Minho.

REFERENCES

• 1: Ahonen, M. and Lietsala, K. 2007. Managing service ideas and suggestions - information systems in innovation brokering, Innovation in Services, Conference Proceedings. Berkeley, CA: Tekes.
• 2: Becker, M. and Zirpoli, F. 2007. Organizing open innovation: the role of competences, modularity, and performance integration, Ac. Manag. Proceedings, 2007, http://program.aomonline.org/2007/submission.asp?mode=ShowSession&SessionID=1841, {25.1.2009}
• 3: Bercovitz, J. E. L. and Feldman, M. P. 2007. Fishing upstream: firm innovation strategy and university research alliances, Res. Policy, 36 2007, 930--948.
• 4: Hans Berends , Wim Vanhaverbeke , Robert Kirschbaum, Knowledge management challenges in new business development: Case study observations, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, v.24 n.4, p.314-328, December, 2007 [doi>10.1016/j.jengtecman.2007.09.006]
• 5: Cardoso, M., Carvalho, J. and Ramos, I. 2008. Open innovation communities& or should it be "networks"? in M. Lytras, E. Damiani and P. Ordoññez de Pablos, Web 2.0: The business model, New York: Springer.
• 6: Chesbrough, H. and Schwartz, K. 2007. Innovating business models with co- development partnerships, Research Technology Management, January -- February 2007, 55--59
• 7: Chesbrough, H. W. and Appleyard, M. M. 2007. Open innovation and strategy, California Management Review, 50 (1), Fall 2007, 57--76.
• 8: Chesbrough, H. W. 2003. The era of open innovation, MIT Sloan Management Review, Spring 2003, 35--41.
• 9: Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W. and West, J. 2006. Open innovation: researching a new paradigm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• 10: Gassmann, O. and Enkel, E. 2004. Towards a theory of open innovation: three core process archetypes, http://de.scientificcommons.org/2287, {26.4.2008}
• 11: Gassmann, O. and Enkel, E. 2005. Management mechanisms of network layers in MNE, http://www.scientificcommons.org/836, {26.4.2008}
• 12: Howe, J. 2006. The rise of crowdsourcing, Wired Magazine, 14 (06).
• 13: Huang, J. C., Newell, S. and Galliers, R. D. 2002. Inter-organizational communities of practice. A research paper submitted to the 3rd Conference on Organizational Knowledge, Learning, and Capabilities, 5-6 April, 2002, Athens.
• 14: Koc, T. and Ceylan, C. 2007. Factors impacting the innovative capacity in large-scale companies, Technovation, 27, 105--114, www.elsevier.com/locate/technovation, {24.1.2008}.
• 15: Christopher Lettl, User involvement competence for radical innovation, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, v.24 n.1-2, p.53-75, March, 2007 [doi>10.1016/j.jengtecman.2007.01.004]
• 16: Morgan, T. 2003. Business rules and information systems: aligning IT with business goals. S.l.: Team-Fly/ Addison Wesley.
• 17: OECD. 2008. Open innovation in global networks, http://browse.oecdbookshop.org/oecd/pdfs/browseit/9208071E.PDF, {4.2.2009}
• 18: Phelps, B. 2007. Electronic information systems and organizational boundaries, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 19 (I-17), 17--29.
• 19: Torro, M. 2007. Global intellectual capital brokering. Facilitating the emergence of innovations through network mediation, Espoo 2007 - VTT Publications 631, 30.
• 20: Wenger, E. 1998. Communities of Practice. Learning as a social system, Systems Thinker, http://www.co-i-l.com/coil/knowledge-garden/cop/lss.shtml, {22.7.2008}.
• 21: Yin, R. 2003. Case study research: Designs and methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
• 22: Von Hippel, E. 2005. Democratizing innovation, Cambridge: MIT Press.
• 23: Rohrbeck, R.2008. Creating an open innovation ecosystem. The case of Deutsche Telekom, Singapore, http://www.rene-rohrbeck.de/documents/Rohrbeck_(2009)_Talk_Creating-an-Open-Innovation-Ecosystem.pdf, {8.3.2009}.
• 24: Teddlie, C. and Fen Yu 2007. Mixed methods sampling. A typology with examples, Journal of Mixed Methods Research, I (1), 77--100.
• 25: Flyvberg, B. 2006. Five misunderstandings about case-study research, Qualitative Inquiry, 12 (2), 219--245.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.1 MODELS AND PRINCIPLES
      H.1.2 User/Machine Systems
          Subjects: Human factors

Additional Classification:
  J. Computer Applications
  J.4 SOCIAL AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
      Subjects: Economics; Sociology

  K. Computing Milieux
  K.4 COMPUTERS AND SOCIETY
      K.4.2 Social Issues

General Terms:
Economics, Human Factors, Verification

Keywords:
crisis, crowdsourcing innovation, online communities, solvers