A view from Mount Olympus: the impact of activity tracking tools on the character and practice of moderation

ABSTRACT

Moderation within online communities is critical. Though many guidelines are available that describe the goals of successful moderation, these often minimize the complex interplay that exists between tools and practices of moderators. This study investigates the role of moderation through the lens of the moderators in a nascent online community for adolescents. Based on an analysis of their activities, three classes of emergent behavior were uncovered when exploring how the available tools impacted the way moderator work was performed. The findings reveal a need for design considerations that take into account the appropriateness of match between the tools and work processes from a moderator perspective.

REFERENCES

• 1: Susan L. Bryant , Andrea Forte , Amy Bruckman, Becoming Wikipedian: transformation of participation in a collaborative online encyclopedia, Proceedings of the 2005 international ACM SIGGROUP conference on Supporting group work, November 06-09, 2005, Sanibel Island, Florida, USA [doi>10.1145/1099203.1099205]
• 2: Burke, M., Joyce, E., Kim, T., Anand, V., & Kraut, R. (2007). Introductions and Requests: Rhetorical Strategies That Elicit Response in Online Communities. In Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Communities and Technologies
• 3: Christensen, K., & Levinson, D. (2003). Encyclopedia of Community: From the Village to the Virtual World: Sage Publications Inc.
• 4: Cosley, D. R. (2006). Helping hands: Design for member-maintained online communities. Doctoral Thesis. UMI Order No. AAT 3227537 University of Minnesota.
• 5: Cramer, M., Zutty, D., Foucault, B., Huffaker, D., Derby, D., & Cassell, J. (2007). Everything in Moderation: The Effects of Adult Moderators in Online Youth Communities In Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Communities and Technologies
• 6: Fredericks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of evidence. Rev Educ Res 74, 59--109.
• 7: Golder, S., Wilkinson, D. M., & Huberman, B. A. (2007). Rhythms of social interaction: messaging within a massive online network. In Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Communities and Technologies, East Lansing, MI.
• 8: Gurzick, D., Lutters, W. G., & Boot, L. (2008). Rethinking recruitment for adolescent online communities. In Proceedings of Internet Research 9.0 (AoIR).
• 9: Guthrie, J. T., & Wigfield, A. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. In P. M. E. M. Kamil (Ed.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 403--422). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
• 10: Hardin, G. (1968). The Tragedy of the Commons. 162(3859), 1243--1248.
• 11: Harper, F. M., Konstan, J. A., Li, X., & Chen, Y. (2005). User Motivations and Incentive Structures in an Online Recommender System. In Proceedings of Group 2005 Workshop on Sustaining Community: The role and design of incentive mechanisms in online systems.
• 12: Kim, A. J. (2000). Community Building on the Web: Secret Strategies for Successful Online Communities. Berkeley, CA: Peachpit Press.
• 13: Koivisto, E. M. I. (2003). Supporting Communities in Massively Multiplayer Online Role-Playing Games by Game Design.
• 14: Cliff Lampe , Paul Resnick, Slash(dot) and burn: distributed moderation in a large online conversation space, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.543-550, April 24-29, 2004, Vienna, Austria [doi>10.1145/985692.985761]
• 15: Lenhart, A., Madden, M., Macgill, A., & Smith, A. (2007). Teens and Social Media. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project.
• 16: Lutters, W., & Ackerman, M. (2003). Joining the Backstage: Locality and Centrality in an Online Community. 16(2), 157--182.
• 17: Markus, M. L. (1987). Toward a 'Critical Mass' Theory of Interactive Media: Universal Access, Interdependence, and Diffusion. 14(5), 491--511.
• 18: Nonnecke, B., & Preece, J. (2001). Why lurkers lurk. In Proceedings of Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS).
• 19: Nonnecke, B., & Preece, J. (2003). Silent participants: getting to know lurkers better. In C. Lueg & D. Fisher (Eds.), From Usenet to CoWebs (pp. 110--132). London: Springer.
• 20: Vicki L. O'Day , Daniel G. Bobrow , Mark Shirley, The social-technical design circle, Proceedings of the 1996 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, p.160-169, November 16-20, 1996, Boston, Massachusetts, United States [doi>10.1145/240080.240246]
• 21: Derek Powazek, Design for Community: The Art of Connecting Real People in Virtual Places, New Riders Publishing, Thousand Oaks, CA, 2001
• 22: Jenny Preece, Online Communities: Designing Usability and Supporting Socialbilty, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, 2000
• 23: Schorr, L. B. (1997). Common Purpose: Strengthening Families and Neighborhoods to Rebuild America: Anchor Books, Doubleday, New York.
• 24: Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Sage Publications Newbury Park, Calif.
• 25: Wise, K., Hamman, B., & Thorson, K. (2006). Moderation, Response Rate, and Message Interactivity: Features of Online Communities and Their Effects on Intent to Participate. J Comput Med Commun 12(1), 24--41.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.5 INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
      H.5.3 Group and Organization Interfaces
          Subjects: Computer-supported cooperative work

General Terms:
Design, Human Factors, Management, Measurement

Keywords:
adolescents, awareness, design, moderation, online communities, sociotechnical systems, tools