ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Implementing new ways of working: interventions and their effect on the use of an electronic medication record
Full text PdfPdf (439 KB)
Source
Conference on Supporting Group Work archive
Proceedings of the ACM 2009 international conference on Supporting group work table of contents
Sanibel Island, Florida, USA
SESSION: Health table of contents
Pages 321-330  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-500-0
Authors
Maren Sander Granlien  Roskilde University, Roskilde, Denmark
Morten Hertzum  Roskilde University, Roskilde, Denmark
Sponsors
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 47,   Downloads (12 Months): 121,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1531674.1531722
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Successful deployment of information technology (IT) involves implementation of new ways of working. Under-recognition of this organizational element of implementation entails considerable risk of not attaining the benefits that motivated deployment, yet knowledge of how to work systematically with organizational implementation is sparse. This study investigates a set of interventions undertaken to implement one mandated procedure associated with an electronic medication record, namely that all information about medication is recorded in the system. Medical record audits show that the interventions, which were devised and performed as part of the study, significantly lowered the number of records that violated the procedure. This positive effect was, however, not achieved until multiple interventions had been employed, and there is some indication that the effect may be wearing off after the interventions have ended. We discuss the implications of these results for efforts to work systematically with the organizational implementation of IT systems.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Aarts, J., and Berg, M. 2006. Same systems, different outcomes: Comparing the implementation of computerized physician order entry in two Dutch hospitals. Methods of Information in Medicine, 45, 1, 53--61.
 
2
Aarts, J., Doorewaard, H., and Berg, M. 2004. Understanding implementation: The case of a computerized physician order entry system in a large Dutch university medical center. Journal of the American Medical Association, 11, 3, 207--216.
 
3
 
4
Ash, J.S., Gorman, P.N., Lavelle, M., Stavri, P.Z., Lyman, J., Fournier, L., and Carpenter, J. 2003. Perceptions of physician order entry: Results of a cross-site qualitative study. Methods of Information in Medicine, 42, 4, 313--323.
 
5
Azad, B., and King, N. 2008. Enacting computer workaround practices within a medication dispensing system. European Journal of Information Systems, 17, 3, 264--278.
 
6
Barker, K.N., Flynn, E.A., Pepper, G.A., Bates, D.W., and Mikeal, R.L. 2002. Medication errors observed in 36 health care facilities. Archives of Internal Medicine, 162, 16, 1897--1903.
 
7
Baskerville, R., and Pries-Heje, J. 1999. Grounded action research: A method for understanding IT in practice. Accounting, Management and Information Technologies, 9, 1, 1--23.
 
8
Berg, M. 1999. Patient care information systems and health care work: A sociotechnical approach. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 55, 2, 87--101.
 
9
 
10
Bossen, C. 2007. Test the artefact - develop the organization. The implementation of an electronic medication plan. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 76, 1, 13--21.
 
11
Brender, J., Ammenwerth, E., Nykänen, P., and Talmon, J. 2006. Factors influencing success and failure of health informatics systems. Methods of Information in Medicine, 45, 1, 125--136.
 
12
Cabana, M.D., Rand, C.S., Powe, N.R., Wu, A.W., Wilson, M.H., Abboud, P.-A.C., and Rubin, H.R. 1999. Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? Journal of the American Medical Association, 282, 15, 1458--1465.
13
 
14
Colón-Emeric, C.S., Lekan, D., Utley-Smith, Q., Ammarell, N., Bailey, D., Corazzini, K., Piven, M.L., and Anderson, R.A. 2007. Barriers to and facilitators of clinical practice guideline use in nursing homes. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 55, 9, 1404--1409.
 
15
Cunningham, T.R., Geller, E.S., and Clarke, S.W. 2008. Impact of electronic prescribing in a hospital setting: A process-focused evaluation. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 77, 8, 546--554.
 
16
17
18
 
19
Granlien, M.F., Hertzum, M., and Gudmundsen, J. 2008. The gap between actual and mandated use of an electronic medication record three years after deployment. In S.K. Andersen, G.O. Klein, S. Schulz, J. Arts, and M.C. Mazzoleni (Eds.), MIE2008: Proceedings of the XXIst International Congress of the European Federation for Medical Informatics. IOS Press, Amsterdam, 419--424.
 
20
Grimshaw, J.M., Shirran, L., Thomas, R., Mowatt, G., Fraser, C., Bero, L., Grilli, R., Harvey, E., Oxman, A., and O'Brien, M.A. 2001. Changing provider behavior: An overview of systematic reviews of interventions. Medical Care, 39, 8, Supplement 2, 2--45.
 
21
Haux, R., Ammenwerth, E., Herzog, W., and Knaup, P. 2002. Health care in the information society. A prognosis for the year 2013. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 66, 1--3, 3--21.
 
22
 
23
Lærum, H., Ellingsen, G., and Faxvaag, A. 2001. Doctors' use of electronic medical records systems in hospitals: Cross sectional survey. BMJ, 323, 7325, 1344--1348.
 
24
 
25
Landry, M.D., and Sibbald, W.J. 2002. Changing physician behavior: A review of patient safety in critical care medicine. Journal of Critical Care, 17, 2, 138--145.
 
26
Leonard-Barton, D. 1988. Implementation as mutual adaptation of technology and organization. Research Policy, 17, 5, 251--267.
 
27
Lium, J.-T., Lærum, H., Schulz, T., and Faxvaag, A. 2006. From the front line, report from a near paperless hospital: Mixed reception among health care professionals. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 13, 6, 668--675.
 
28
Mabeck, H. 2008. Implementation of an electronic medication system and disregarded power of the record. In S.K. Andersen, G.O. Klein, S. Schulz, J. Aarts, and M.C. Mazzoleni (Eds.), MIE2008: Proceedings of the XXIst International Congress of the European Federation for Medical Informatics. IOS Press, Amsterdam, 443--448.
29
 
30
Markus, M.L. 2004. Technochange management: Using IT to drive organizational change. Journal of Information Technology, 19, 1, 4--20.
 
31
Markus, M.L., and Benjamin, R.I. 1997. The magic bullet theory in IT-enabled transformation. Sloan Management Review, 38, 2, 55--68.
 
32
Mayo, E. 1933. The human problems of an industrial civilization. MacMillan, New York.
 
33
Mikkelsen, G., and Aasly, J. 2001. Concordance of information in parallel electronic and paper based patient records. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 63, 3, 123--131.
 
34
Orlikowski, W.J., and Hofman, J.D. 1997. An improvisational model for change management: The case of groupware technologies. Sloan Management Review, 38, 2, 11--22.
 
35
Paré, G., and Trudel, M.-C. 2007. Knowledge barriers to PACS adoption and implementation in hospitals. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 76, 1, 22--33.
 
36
Scott, J.T., Rundall, T.G., Vogt, T.M., and Hsu, J. 2005. Kaiser Permanente's experience of implementing an electronic medical record: A qualitative study. BMJ, 331, 7528, 1313--1316.
 
37
Senderovitz, T., Christophersen, A.B., Christensen, H.R., and Kampmann, J.P. 1998. Discrepancies between medical records and dispensing records in two large hospital departments in Copenhagen. Ugeskrift for Læger, 160, 27, 4055--4058.
 
38
Simonsen, J., and Hertzum, M. 2008. Participative design and the challenges of large-scale systems: Extending the iterative PD approach. In J. Simonsen, T. Robertson and D. Hakken (Eds.), PDC2008: Proceedings of the Tenth Anniversary Conference on Participatory Design. ACM Press, New York, 1--10.
 
39
Sobol, M.G., Alverson, M., and Lei, D. 1999. Barriers to the adoption of computerized technology in health care systems. Topics in Health Information Management, 19, 4, 1--19.
 
40
Tyre, M.J., and Orlikowski, W.J. 1994. Windows of opportunity: Temporal patterns of technological adaptation in organizations. Organization Science, 5, 1, 98--118.
 
41
Wensing, M., van der Weijden, T., and Grol, R. 1998. Implementing guidelines and innovations in general practice: Which interventions are effective? British Journal of General Practice, 48, 427, 991--997.
42

Collaborative Colleagues:
Maren Sander Granlien: colleagues
Morten Hertzum: colleagues