ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Information handover in time-critical work
Full text PdfPdf (526 KB)
Source
Conference on Supporting Group Work archive
Proceedings of the ACM 2009 international conference on Supporting group work table of contents
Sanibel Island, Florida, USA
SESSION: Health table of contents
Pages 301-310  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-500-0
Authors
Aleksandra Sarcevic  Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
Randall S. Burd  Children's National Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
Sponsors
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 17,   Downloads (12 Months): 70,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1531674.1531720
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Information transfer under time pressure and stress often leads to information loss. This paper studies the characteristics and problems of information handover from the emergency medical services (EMS) crew to the trauma team when a critically injured patient arrives to the trauma bay. We consider the characteristics of the handover process and the subsequent use of transferred information. Our goal is to support the design of technology for information transfer by identifying specific challenges faced by EMS crews and trauma teams during handover. Data were drawn from observation and video recording of 18 trauma resuscitations. The study shows how EMS crews report information from the field and the types of information that they include in their reports. Particular problems occur when reports lack structure, continuity, and complete descriptions of treatments given en route. We also found that trauma team members have problems retaining reported information. They pay attention to the items needed for immediately treating the patient and inquire about other items when needed during the resuscitation. The paper identifies a set of design challenges that arise during information transfer under time pressure and stress, and discusses characteristics of potential technological solutions.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
American College of Surgeons. 2005. Advanced Trauma Life Support® (ATLS®), 7th Edition, Chicago, IL.
 
2
Cheah, L-P., Amott, D. H., Pollard, J., and Watters, D. A. K. 2005. Electronic medical handover: Towards safer medical care. Med. J. Australia, 183, 7, 369--372.
 
3
Cook, R.I., Woods D.D., and Miller C. 1998. A Tale of Two Stories: Contrasting Views on Patient Safety. Chicago, IL: The Foundation.
 
4
Currie, J. 2002. Improving the efficiency of patient handover. Emergency Nurse, 10, 3, 24--27.
 
5
Emergency Medical Technician-Basic: National Standard Curriculum. Online at: http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov
 
6
Gawande, A. 2007. The checklist. The New Yorker, 83, 39, (December 10, 2007), 86--95.
 
7
Hopkins, A. 2000. Lessons from Longford: The Esso Gas Plant Explosion. Sydney: CCH.
 
8
Horn, J., Bell, M.D.D., and Moss, E. 2004. Handover of responsibility for the anaesthetised patient' opinion and practice. Anaesthesia, 59, 7, 658--663.
 
9
Kerr, M.P. 2002. A qualitative study of shift handover practice and function from a socio-technical perspective. J. Advanced Nursing, 37, 2, 125--134.
 
10
King, R.W. 1990. Safety in the Process Industries. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
 
11
McFetridge, B., Gillespie, M., Goode, D., and Melby, V. 2007. An exploration of the handover process of critically ill patients between nursing staff from the emergency department and the intensive care unit. Nursing in Critical Care, 12, 6, 261--269.
 
12
National Trauma Data Bank Annual Report. 2008. Online at: http://www.facs.org/trauma/ntdb.html
 
13
Patterson, E. S., Roth, E. M., Woods, D. D., Chow, R., and Orlando, J. 2004. Handoff strategies in settings with high consequence for failure: Lessons for health care operations. International J. Qual. Health, 16, 2, 125--132.
 
14
 
15
Reason, J.T. 2002. Combating omission errors through task analysis and good reminders. Quality & Safety in Health Care, 11, 1 (March 1 2002), 40--44.
16
 
17
Scott, L.A., Brice, J.H., Baker, C.C., and Shen, P. 2003. An analysis of paramedic verbal reports to physicians in the emergency department trauma room. Prehospital Emergency Care, 7, 2, 247--251.
 
18
Smith, A. F., Pope, C., Goodwin, D., and Mort, M. 2008. Interprofessional handover and patient safety in anaesthesia. British J. Anaesthesia, 101, 3, 332--337.
 
19
Solet, D.J., Norvell, J.M., Rutan, G.H., and Frankel, R.M. 2005. Lost in translation: Challenges and opportunities in physician-to-physician communication during patient handoffs. Academic Medicine, 80, 12, 1094--1099.
 
20
Talbot, R., and Bleetman, A. 2007. Retention of information by emergency department staff at ambulance handover: Do standardised approaches work? Emergency Medicine J., 24, 8, 539--542.
21
 
22
Thakore, S., and Morrison, W. 2001. A survey of the perceived quality of patient handover by ambulance staff in the resuscitation room. Emergency Medicine Journal, 18, 293--296.
23
 
24
Wilson, S., Galliers, J., and Fone, J. 2005. Medical handover: A study and implications for information technology. In Proceedings of HEPS 2005, 337--341.
 
25
Wu, A., Pronovost, P., and Morlock, L. 2002. ICU incident reporting systems. J. Critical Care, 17, 2 (June 2002), 86--94.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Aleksandra Sarcevic: colleagues
Randall S. Burd: colleagues