|
ABSTRACT
Coping with a new health issue often requires individuals to acquire knowledge and skills to manage personal health. Many patients turn to one another for experiential expertise outside the formal bounds of the health-care system. Internet-based social software can facilitate expertise sharing among patients, but provides only limited ways for users to locate sources of patient expertise. Although much prior research has investigated expertise location and systems to augment expertise sharing in workplace organizations, the transferability of this knowledge to other contexts, such as personal health, is unclear. Guided by expertise locating frameworks drawn from prior work, we conducted a field study to investigate expertise locating in the informal and everyday context of women diagnosed with breast cancer. Similarities between patients' expertise locating practices and practices of professionals in workplace organizations suggest similar support strategies could apply in both contexts. However, unlike professionals, unsolicited advice often triggered patients to locate expertise. They identified expertise through various forms of gatekeeping. The high-stakes nature of problems patients faced also led them to use triangulation strategies in anticipation of breakdowns in expertise location. Based on these key differences, we explored five design additions to social software that could support patients in their critical need to locate patient expertise.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
Abrahamson, .JA., Fisher, K.E., Turner, A.G., Durrance, J.C., and Combs Turner, T. 2008. Lay information mediary behavior uncovered: exploring how nonprofessionals seek health information for themselves and others online. J. Med. Libr. Assoc. 96, 4(Oct. 2008), 310--323.
|
| |
2
|
Adams, S. 2008. Blog-based applications and health information: Two case studies that illustrate important questions for Consumer Health Informatics (CHI) research. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2008. DOI=10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.06.009
|
| |
3
|
Allen, T.J. and Cohen, S.I. 1969. Information flow in research and development laboratories. Admin Sci Quart . 14, 1 (Mar. 1969), 12--19.
|
| |
4
|
Civan, A. and Pratt, W. 2007. Threading Together Patient Expertise. In Proc. of AMIA Annu. Fall Symp. (2007), 140--144.
|
| |
5
|
Civan, A. and Pratt, W. 2007. Information Systems and Healthcare XXII: Characterizing and Visualizing the Quality of Health Information. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 20, 18 (2007).
|
| |
6
|
Ehrlich K. and Cash, D. 1994. Turning Information into Knowledge: Information Finding as a Collaborative Activity. In Proc. of Digital Libraries (1994), 19--25.
|
 |
7
|
|
 |
8
|
|
| |
9
|
Elkin, N. 2008. How America searches: Health and wellness. iCrossing, a digital company (Jan. 2008), available from: http://www.icrossing.com/research/how-america-searches-health-and-wellness.php
|
| |
10
|
Erledez, S. 1999. Information encountering: It's more than just bumping into information. B. Am. Soc. Inform. Inf. 25, 3 (Feb/Mar 1999), 25--29.
|
| |
11
|
|
| |
12
|
Fisher, K.E. and Naumer, C.M. 2006. Information grounds: Theoretical basis and empirical findings on information flow in social settings. In New Directions in Human Information Behavior, A. Spink and C. Cole (Eds.), Springer, The Netherlands, 93--111.
|
| |
13
|
Frost, J.H. and Massagli, M.P. 2008. Social uses of personal health information within PatientsLikeMe, an online patient community: What can happen when patients have access to one another's data. J. Med. Internet Res. 10, 3(May. 2008):e15.
|
| |
14
|
Gross, M. 2001. Imposed information seeking in public libraries and school library media centres: a common behaviour? Information Research. 6, 2 (Jan 2001).
|
| |
15
|
Hinds, P.J. and Pfiffer, J. 2002. Why organizations don't "know what they know": Cognitive and motivational factors affecting the transfer of expertise. In Sharing Expertise: Beyond Knowledge Management, MS Ackerman, V. Pipek, & V. Wulf (Eds.), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA., 3--26.
|
| |
16
|
Hoey, L.M., Ieropoli, S.C., White, V.M.,and Jefford, M. 2008. Systematic review of peer-support programs for people with cancer. Patient Educ Couns. 70, 3 (Mar.2008), 315--37.
|
 |
17
|
|
 |
18
|
|
 |
19
|
|
| |
20
|
Meier, A., Lyons, E.J., Frydman, G., Forlenza, M., Rimer, B.K. 2007. How cancer survivors provide support on cancer-related Internet mailing lists. J. Med. Internet Res. 9, 2 (May. 2007), e12.
|
| |
21
|
Metoyer-Duran, C. 1993. Gatekeepers in ethnolinguistic communities. Ablex, Norwood, NJ.
|
| |
22
|
Orr, J. 1996. Talking about Machines: An ethnography of a modern job. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.
|
| |
23
|
|
| |
24
|
Petersen, A. 2006. The best experts: The narratives of those with a genetic condition. Soc. Sci. Med. 63, 1 (Jul. 2006), 32--42.
|
| |
25
|
Rappaport, J. 2000. Community narratives: Tales of terror and joy. Americal Journal of Community Psychology 2000 28(1):1--24.
|
| |
26
|
Savolainen, R. 1995. Everyday life information seeking: Approaching information seeking in the context of "way of life". LISR 1995 17: 259--294.
|
| |
27
|
Sarasohn-Kahn, J. 2008. The wisdom of patients: Health care meets online social media. California Healthcare Foundation iHealth reports. (Apr. 2008), available from: http://www.chcf.org/documents/chronicdisease/HealthCareSocialMedia.pdf
|
 |
28
|
|
 |
29
|
|
| |
30
|
|
 |
31
|
|
| |
32
|
Unruh, K.T. 2008. Information and the Cancer Experience: A Study of Patient Work in Cancer Care. Doctoral Thesis. UMI Publication No. AAT-3290610; ISBN 9780549344414, University of Washington.
|
 |
33
|
|
| |
34
|
Wilson, T.D. 1999. Models in information behaviour research. Journal of Documentation, 55, 3 (1999), 249--270.
|
|