ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Image, appearance and vanity in the use of media spaces and video conference systems
Full text PdfPdf (600 KB)
Source
Conference on Supporting Group Work archive
Proceedings of the ACM 2009 international conference on Supporting group work table of contents
Sanibel Island, Florida, USA
SESSION: Computer-mediated communication II table of contents
Pages 253-262  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-500-0
Authors
Jose Eurico de Vasconcelos Filho  PUC-Rio, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Kori M. Inkpen  Microsoft Research, Redmond, WA, USA
Mary Czerwinski  Microsoft Research, Redmond, WA, USA
Sponsors
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 13,   Downloads (12 Months): 61,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1531674.1531712
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Media spaces and videoconference systems are beneficial for connecting separated co-workers and providing rich contextual information. However, image sharing communication tools may also touch on sensitive spots of the human psyche related to personal, perceived image issues (e.g., appearance, self-image, self-presentation and vanity). We conducted two user studies to examine the impact of self-image concerns on the use of media spaces and videoconference systems. Our results suggest that personal, perceived image concerns have a considerable impact on the comfort level of users and may hinder effective communication [8]. We also found that image filtering techniques can help users feel more comfortable. Our results revealed that distortion filters, which are frequently cited to help preserve privacy, do not tend to be the ones preferred by users. Instead, users seemed to favor filters that make subtle changes to their appearance, or, in some instances, they preferred to use a surrogate instead.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
6
7
 
8
Campbell, J. Media richness, communication apprehension and participation in group videoconferencing. Journal of Information, Information Technology, and Organizations, 1, 87--96, 2006.
9
10
 
11
Ellison, N., Heino, R., and Gibbs, J. Managing impression online: Self-presentation processes in the online dating environment. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11, 415--441, 2006.
12
13
 
14
Gangestad, S. W., and Synder, M. Self-monitoring: Appraisal and reappraisal. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 530--555, 2000.
15
 
16
Goffman, E. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Doubleday Anchor Books, Garden City, New York, 1959.
 
17
Greenberg, S. and Kuzuoka, H. Using Digital but Physical Surrogates to Mediate Awareness, Communication and Privacy in Media Spaces. Personal Technologies, 4(1), 182--198, 2000.
18
 
19
Hinds, P. J. The cognitive and interpersonal costs of video. Media Psychology, 1, 283--311, 1999.
20
 
21
Kimmerle, J., Cress, U. Group awareness and self-presentation in computer-supported information exchange. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 3(1), 85--97, 2008.
 
22
Logitech Video-effects. disponible on-line at: http://www.logitech.com/index.cfm/webcam_communications/video_software_services/video_effects/
23
24
 
25
Noll, A. M. Anatomy of a failure: Picturephone revisited. Telecommunications Policy, 16, 307--316, 1992.
26
 
27
Patil, S., and Kobsa, A. Privacy in collaboration: Managing impression. Proceedings of Online Communities and Social Computing, 2005.
 
28
Scott, C.R. and Timmerman, C.E. Relating computer, communication, and computer-mediated communication apprehensions to new communication technology use in the workplace. Communication Research, 32, 683--725, 2005.
 
29
Storck, J., and Sproull, L. Through a glass darkly: What do people learn in videoconferences? Human Communication Research, 22, 197--219, 1995.
30
31
 
32
Walther, J. B., Slovacek, C., and Tidwell, L. C. Is a picture worth a thousand words? Photographic images in long term and short term virtual teams. Communication Research, 28, 105--134, 2001.
 
33
Williams, E. Teleconferencing: social and psychological factors. Journal of Communication, 28, 125--131, 1978.
 
34
Wolfe, R. N., Lennox, R. D., and Cutler, B. L. Getting along and getting ahead: Empirical support for a theory of protective and acquisitive self-presentation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 356--361, 1986.
 
35
Zhang, C., Rui, Y., and He, L. Lightweight background blurring for video conferencing applications. Proceedings of ICIP 2006, 481--484, 2006.
36

Collaborative Colleagues:
Jose Eurico de Vasconcelos Filho: colleagues
Kori M. Inkpen: colleagues
Mary Czerwinski: colleagues