ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Lazy scheduling of processing and transmission tasks in collaborative systems
Full text PdfPdf (1.25 MB)
Source
Conference on Supporting Group Work archive
Proceedings of the ACM 2009 international conference on Supporting group work table of contents
Sanibel Island, Florida, USA
SESSION: Collaborative tools and technologies I table of contents
Pages 159-168  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-500-0
Authors
Sasa Junuzovic  University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Prasun Dewan  University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Sponsors
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6,   Downloads (12 Months): 35,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1531674.1531698
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

A collaborative system must perform both processing and transmission tasks. We present a policy for scheduling these tasks on a single core that is inspired by studies of human perception and the real-time systems field. It lazily delays the execution of the processing task if the delay cannot be noticed by humans. We use simulations and formal analysis to compare this policy with previous scheduling policies. We show that the policy trades-off an unnoticeable degradation in performance of some users for a much larger noticeable improvement in performance of others.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Abdelkhalek, A., Bilas, A., and Moshovos, A. 2001. Behavior and performance of interactive multi-player game servers. ISPASS 2001.
 
2
Brosh, E. and Shavitt, Y. 2004. Approximation and heuristic algorithms for minimum delay application-layer multicast trees. INFOCOM 2004.
3
4
 
5
Junuzovic, S. and Dewan, P. 2008. Serial vs. concurrent scheduling of transmission and processing tasks in collaborative systems. CollaborateCom 2008.
 
6
 
7
p2pSim: a simulator for peer-to-peer protocols. http://pdos.csail.mit.edu/p2psim/kingdata. Mar 4, 2009.
 
8
 
9
Shneiderman, B. 1998. Response time and display rate. in Designing the user-interface: strategies for effective human-computer interaction. Addison-Wesley Longman.
 
10
Sun, J. and Liu, J. 1996. Synchronization protocols in distributed real-time systems. ICDCS 1996.
 
11
Youmans, D.M. 1981. User requirements for future office workstations with emphasis on preferred response times. IBM United Kingdom Laboratories.
12

Collaborative Colleagues:
Sasa Junuzovic: colleagues
Prasun Dewan: colleagues