GroupMind: supporting idea generation through a collaborative mind-mapping tool

ABSTRACT

Collaborative brainstorming can be a challenging but important part of creative group problem solving. Mind-mapping has the potential to enhance the brainstorming process but has its own challenges when used in a group. We introduce GroupMind, a collaborative mind-mapping tool that addresses these challenges and opens new opportunities for creative teamwork, including brainstorming. We present a semi-controlled evaluation of GroupMind and its impact on teamwork, problem solving and collaboration for brainstorming activities. GroupMind performs better than using a traditional whiteboard in both interaction group and nominal group settings for the task involving memory recall. The hierarchical mind-map structure also imposes important framing effects on group dynamics and idea organization during the brainstorming process. We also present design ideas to assist in the development of future tools to support creative problem solving in groups.

REFERENCES

• 1: Gregory D. Abowd , Alan J. Dix, Giving undo attention, Interacting with Computers, v.4 n.3, p.317-342, Dec. 1992 [doi>10.1016/0953-5438(92)90021-7]
• 2: Milam Aiken , Jay Krosp , Ashraf Shirani , Jeanette Martin, Electronic brainstorming in small and large groups, Information and Management, v.27 n.3, p.141-149, Sept. 1994 [doi>10.1016/0378-7206(94)90042-6]
• 3: Barki, H. and Pinsonneault, A. Small Group Brainstorming and Idea Quality: Is Electronic Brainstorming the Most Effective Approach? Small Group Research 32, 2 (2001), 158--205.
• 4: Bouchard, T.J. Personality, problem-solving procedure, and performance in small groups. Journal of Applied Psychology 53, 1 (1969), 1--29.
• 5: Bouchard, T.J. and Hare, M. Size, performance, and potential in brainstorming groups. Journal of Applied Psychology 54, 1 (1970), 51--55.
• 6: Robert O. Briggs , Bruce A. Reinig , Morgan M. Shepherd, Quality as a Function of Quantity in Electronic Brainstorming, Proceedings of the 30th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences: Information Systems Track-Collaboration Systems and Technology, p.94, January 03-06, 1997
• 7: bubbl.us. http://www.bubbl.us/.
• 8: Buzan, T. Use Both Sides of Your Brain: New Mind-Mapping Techniques, Third Edition. Plume, 1991.
• 9: Commons, M.L., Trudeau, E.J., Stein, S.A., Richards, F.A., and Krause, S.R. Hierarchical Complexity of Tasks Shows the Existence of Developmental Stages. Developmental Review 18, 3 (1998), 237--278.
• 10: Jeff Conklin , Michael L. Begeman, gIBIS: a hypertext tool for exploratory policy discussion, Proceedings of the 1988 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work, p.140-152, September 26-28, 1988, Portland, Oregon, United States [doi>10.1145/62266.62278]
• 11: T. Connolly , L. M. Jessup , J. S. Valacich, Effects of anonymity and evaluative tone on idea generation in computer-mediated groups, Management Science, v.36 n.6, p.689-703, Jun. 1990 [doi>10.1287/mnsc.36.6.689]
• 12: Connolly, T., Routhieaux, R.L., and Schneider, S.K. On the Effectiveness of Group Brainstorming: Test of One Underlying Cognitive Mechanism. Small Group Research 24, 4 (1993), 490--503.
• 13: Delbecq, A.L., Ven, A.H.V.D., and Gustafson, D.H. Group Techniques for Program Planning: A Guide to Nominal Group and Delphi Processes. Scott, Foresman, and Company, 1975.
• 14: Dennis, A., Valacich, J., and Nunamaker, J. An experimental investigation of the effects of group size in an electronic meeting environment. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 20, 5 (1990), 1049--1057.
• 15: Dennis, A.R. and Valacich, J.S. Computer brainstorms: More heads are better than one. Journal of Applied Psychology 78, 4 (1993), 531--537.
• 16: Dennis, A.R. and Valacich, J.S. Group, Sub-Group, and Nominal Group Idea Generation: New Rules for a New Media? Journal of Management 20, 4 (1994), 723--736.
• 17: Diehl, M. and Stroebe, W. Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 53, 3 (1987), 497--509.
• 18: Joan Morris DiMicco , Anna Pandolfo , Walter Bender, Influencing group participation with a shared display, Proceedings of the 2004 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, November 06-10, 2004, Chicago, Illinois, USA [doi>10.1145/1031607.1031713]
• 19: Dugosh, K.L. and Paulus, P.B. Cognitive and social comparison processes in brainstorming. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 41, 3 (2005), 313--320.
• 20: Farrand, P., Hussain, F., and Hennessy, E. The efficacy of the 'mind map' study technique. Medical Education 36, 5 (2002), 426--431.
• 21: FreeMind. http://freemind.sourceforge.net/.
• 22: Gallupe, R.B., Bastianutti, L.M., and Cooper, W.H. Unblocking brainstorms. Journal of Applied Psychology 76, 1 (1991), 137--142.
• 23: Gallupe, R.B., Dennis, A.R., Cooper, W.H., Valacich, J.S., Bastianutti, L.M., and Nunamaker, J.F. Electronic Brainstorming and Group Size. The Academy of Management Journal 35, 2 (1992), 350--369.
• 24: Grossman, S.R. Brainstorming Updated. Training & Development Journal 38, 2 (1984), 84.
• 25: Joshua Hailpern , Erik Hinterbichler , Caryn Leppert , Damon Cook , Brian P. Bailey, TEAM STORM: demonstrating an interaction model for working with multiple ideas during creative group work, Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGCHI conference on Creativity & cognition, June 13-15, 2007, Washington, DC, USA [doi>10.1145/1254960.1254987]
• 26: Hollingshead, A.B., Mcgrath, J.E., and O'Connor, K.M. Group Task Performance and Communication Technology: A Longitudinal Study of Computer-Mediated Versus Face-to-Face Work Groups. Small Group Research 24, 3 (1993), 307--333.
• 27: Charles McLaughlin Hymes , Gary M. Olson, Unblocking brainstorming through the use of a simple group editor, Proceedings of the 1992 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work, p.99-106, November 01-04, 1992, Toronto, Ontario, Canada [doi>10.1145/143457.143467]
• 28: Kiesler, S. and Cummings, J.N. What Do We Know about Proximity and Distance in Work Groups? A Legacy of Research. In Distributed Work. The MIT Press, 2002, 57--80.
• 29: Taemie Kim , Agnes Chang , Lindsey Holland , Alex Sandy Pentland, Meeting mediator: enhancing group collaborationusing sociometric feedback, Proceedings of the ACM 2008 conference on Computer supported cooperative work, November 08-12, 2008, San Diego, CA, USA [doi>10.1145/1460563.1460636]
• 30: John M. Linebarger , Andrew J. Scholand , Mark A. Ehlen , Michael J. Procopio, Benefits of synchronous collaboration support for an application-centered analysis team working on complex problems: a case study, Proceedings of the 2005 international ACM SIGGROUP conference on Supporting group work, November 06-09, 2005, Sanibel Island, Florida, USA [doi>10.1145/1099203.1099211]
• 31: Madsen, D.B. and Finger, J.R. Comparison of a written feedback procedure, group brainstorming, and individual brainstorming. Journal of Applied Psychology 63, 1 (1978), 120--123.
• 32: McAleese, R. The Knowledge Arena as an Extension to the Concept Map: Reflection in Action. Interactive Learning Environments 6, 3 (1998), 251.
• 33: Poppy Lauretta McLeod, An assessment of the experimental literature on electronic support of group work: results of a meta-analysis, Human-Computer Interaction, v.7 n.3, p.257-280, September 1992 [doi>10.1207/s15327051hci0703_1]
• 34: Michinov, N. and Primois, C. Improving productivity and creativity in online groups through social comparison process: New evidence for asynchronous electronic brainstorming. Computers in Human Behavior 21, 1 (2005), 11--28.
• 35: Mindjet. http://www.mindjet.com/.
• 36: MindMeister. http://www.mindmeister.com/.
• 37: Mullen, B., Johnson, C., and Salas, E. Productivity Loss in Brainstorming Groups: A Meta-Analytic Integration. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 12, 1 (1991), 3.
• 38: Nohria, N. Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form and Action. Harvard Business School Press, 1993.
• 39: J. F. Nunamaker , Alan R. Dennis , Joseph S. Valacich , Douglas Vogel , Joey F. George, Electronic meeting systems, Communications of the ACM, v.34 n.7, p.40-61, July 1991 [doi>10.1145/105783.105793]
• 40: O'Donnell, A., Dansereau, D., and Hall, R. Knowledge Maps as Scaffolds for Cognitive Processing. Educational Psychology Review 14, 1 (2002), 71--86.
• 41: Judith S. Olson , Gary M. Olson , Marianne Storrøsten , Mark Carter, Groupwork close up: a comparison of the group design process with and without a simple group editor, ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), v.11 n.4, p.321-348, Oct. 1993 [doi>10.1145/159764.159763]
• 42: Osborn, A.F. Applied Imagination. Charles Scribner's Sons, 1953.
• 43: Paulus, P.B. and Dzindolet, M.T. Social influence processes in group brainstorming. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 64, 4 (1993), 575--586.
• 44: Paulus, P.B., Dugosh, K.L., Dzindolet, M.T., Coskun, H., and Putman, V.L. Social and Cognitive Influences in Group Brainstorming: Predicting Production Gains and Losses. European Review of Social Psychology 12, (2002), 299.
• 45: Alain Pinsonneault , Henri Barki , R. Brent Gallupe , Norberto Hoppen, Electronic Brainstorming: the Illusion of Productivity, Information Systems Research, v.10 n.2, p.110-133, February 1999 [doi>10.1287/isre.10.2.110]
• 46: Thorsten Prante , Carsten Magerkurth , Norbert Streitz, Developing CSCW tools for idea finding -: empirical results and implications for design, Proceedings of the 2002 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, November 16-20, 2002, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA [doi>10.1145/587078.587094]
• 47: Matthias Ressel , Doris Nitsche-Ruhland , Rul Gunzenhäuser, An integrating, transformation-oriented approach to concurrency control and undo in group editors, Proceedings of the 1996 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, p.288-297, November 16-20, 1996, Boston, Massachusetts, United States [doi>10.1145/240080.240305]
• 48: Rietzschel, E.F., Nijstad, B.A., and Stroebe, W. Productivity is not enough: A comparison of interactive and nominal brainstorming groups on idea generation and selection. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 42, 2 (2006), 244--251.
• 49: Morgan M. Shepherd , Robert O. Briggs , Bruce A. Reinig , Jerome Yen , Jay F. Nunamaker, Jr., Invoking social comparison to improve electronic brainstorming: beyond anonymity, Journal of Management Information Systems, v.12 n.3, p.155-170, December 1995
• 50: Frank M. Shipman, III , Catherine C. Marshall, Formality Considered Harmful: Experiences, EmergingThemes, and Directions on the Use of Formal Representations inInteractive Systems, Computer Supported Cooperative Work, v.8 n.4, p.333-352, Oct. 1999 [doi>10.1023/A:1008716330212]
• 51: Sosik, J.J. Effects of Transformational Leadership and Anonymity on Idea Generation in Computer-Mediated Groups. Group Organization Management 22, 4 (1997), 460--487.
• 52: Mark Stefik , Gregg Foster , Daniel G. Bobrow , Kenneth Kahn , Stan Lanning , Lucy Suchman, Beyond the chalkboard: computer support for collaboration and problem solving in meetings, Communications of the ACM, v.30 n.1, p.32-47, Jan. 1987 [doi>10.1145/7885.7887]
• 53: Street, W.R. Brainstorming by individuals, coacting and interacting groups. Journal of Applied Psychology 59, 4 (1974), 433--436.
• 54: Norbert A. Streitz , Jörg Geißler , Jörg M. Haake , Jeroen Hol, DOLPHIN: integrated meeting support across local and remote desktop environments and LiveBoards, Proceedings of the 1994 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, p.345-358, October 22-26, 1994, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States [doi>10.1145/192844.193044]
• 55: Stroebe, W., Diehl, M., and Abakoumkin, G. The Illusion of Group Effectivity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 18, 5 (1992), 643--650.
• 56: Taylor, D.W., Berry, P.C., and Block, C.H. Does Group Participation When Using Brainstorming Facilitate or Inhibit Creative Thinking? Administrative Science Quarterly 3, 1 (1958), 23--47.
• 57: Stephanie D. Teasley , Lisa A. Covi , M. S. Krishnan , Judith S. Olson, Rapid software development through team collocation, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, v.28 n.7, p.671-683, July 2002 [doi>10.1109/TSE.2002.1019481]
• 58: The Automatic. http://www.ljmu.ac.uk/automatic/index.htm.
• 59: Thinkature. http://thinkature.com/.
• 60: Valacich, J.S., Dennis, A.R., and Nunamaker, J.F. Group Size and Anonymity Effects on Computer-Mediated Idea Generation. Small Group Research 23, 1 (1992), 49--73.
• 61: Valacich, J.S., George, J.F., Nunamaker, J.F., and Vogel, D.R. Physical Proximity Effects on Computer-Mediated Group Idea Generation. Small Group Research 25, 1 (1994), 83--104.
• 62: Valacich, J.S., Mennecke, B., Wachter, R., and Wheeler, B. Computer-mediated idea generation: the effects of group size and group heterogeneity. Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, (1993), 152--160.
• 63: Chauncey E. Wilson, Brainstorming pitfalls and best practices, interactions, v.13 n.5, September + October 2006 [doi>10.1145/1151314.1151342]

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.5 INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
      H.5.3 Group and Organization Interfaces
          Subjects: Collaborative computing

Additional Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.5 INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
      H.5.3 Group and Organization Interfaces
          Subjects: Evaluation/methodology; Synchronous interaction; Computer-supported cooperative work

General Terms:
Design, Experimentation, Human Factors, Measurement, Performance, Theory

Keywords:
brainstorming, collocation, formal and informal structures, group dynamics, large display, mind-mapping