ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Digital Library logoTake a look at the new version of this page: [ beta version ]. Tell us what you think.
The influence of boundary objects on group collaboration in construction project teams
Full text PdfPdf (410 KB)
Source
Conference on Supporting Group Work archive
Proceedings of the ACM 2009 international conference on Supporting group work table of contents
Sanibel Island, Florida, USA
SESSION: Group collaboration and interaction table of contents
Pages: 125-128  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-500-0
Authors
Andreas F. Phelps  The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
Madhu Reddy  The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
Sponsors
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 17,   Downloads (12 Months): 127,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1531674.1531693
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This note outlines the critical role that boundary objects play in construction project teams. In this domain, boundary objects extend beyond their traditional role as information artifacts used to communicate between teams to serve a more influential role as guides for team collaboration.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Lawrence, P.R. and Lorsch, J.W. (1967). Differentiation and Integration in Complex Organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 12, No. 1: 1--47
 
2
March, J. and Simon, H. (1958) Organizations. New York: Wiley.
 
3
Katz, D. and Kahn, R. (1966). The Social Psychology of Organizations. New York: Wiley
 
4
Star, Susan L., and Griesemer, James R. (1989) "Institutional Ecology, 'Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39." Social Studies of Science Vol. 19: 387--420.
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
Egan J. (2002) Accelerating change. London: Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions.
 
9
Carrillo, P. and Chinowsky, P.S. (2006). Exploiting Knowledge management: The Engineering and Construction Perspective, Journal of Management in Engineering, ASCE, 22(1), 2--10.
 
10
Polanyi, M. 1966. The Tacit Dimension. Anchor Day Books, New York.
 
11
Tushman, M.L. (1977). Special Boundary Roles in the Innovation Process. Administrative Science Quarterly. Vol 22, p 587--605
 
12
Strauss, A. (1991) Creating Sociological Awareness: Collective Images and Symbolic Representations. Transaction, New Brunswick.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Andreas F. Phelps: colleagues
Madhu Reddy: colleagues