ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Is Wikipedia growing a longer tail?
Full text PdfPdf (714 KB)
Source
Conference on Supporting Group Work archive
Proceedings of the ACM 2009 international conference on Supporting group work table of contents
Sanibel Island, Florida, USA
SESSION: Social software II table of contents
Pages 105-114  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-500-0
Authors
Shyong (Tony) K. Lam  University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
John Riedl  University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
Sponsors
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 27,   Downloads (12 Months): 118,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1531674.1531690
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Wikipedia has millions of articles, many of which receive little attention. One group of Wikipedians believes these obscure entries should be removed because they are uninteresting and neglected; these are the deletionists. Other Wikipedians disagree, arguing that this long tail of articles is precisely Wikipedia's advantage over other encyclopedias; these are the inclusionists. This paper looks at two overarching questions on the debate between deletionists and inclusionists: (1) What are the implications to the long tail of the evolving standards for article birth and death? (2) How is viewership affected by the decreasing notability of articles in the long tail? The answers to five detailed research questions that are inspired by these overarching questions should help better frame this debate and provide insight into how Wikipedia is evolving.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
 
3
I. Beschastnikh, T. Kriplean, and D. W. McDonald. Wikipedian self-governance in action: Motivating the policy lens. In Proc. ICWSM 2008, Seattle,WA, USA, 2008. AAAI.
4
 
5
A. Clauset, C. R. Shalizi, and M. E. J. Newman. Power-law distributions in empirical data. 0706.1062, June 2007.
 
6
 
7
J. Giles. Internet encyclopaedias go head to head. Nature, 438(7070):900--901, Dec. 2005.
 
8
 
9
M. L. Goldstein, S. A. Morris, and G. G. Yen. Problems with fitting to the power-law distribution. The European Physical Journal B - Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, 41(2):255--258, 2004.
 
10
A. Kittur, E. H. Chi, B. A. Pendleton, B. Suh, and T. Mytkowicz. Power of the few vs. wisdom of the crowd: Wikipedia and the rise of the bourgeoisie. In Proc. CHI 2007, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 2007. ACM.
11
12
 
13
14
 
15
THEwikiStics. Yearly wikimedia page hits comparison. http://wikistics.falsikon.de/2008/, 2008.
16
17
18
19

Collaborative Colleagues:
Shyong (Tony) K. Lam: colleagues
John Riedl: colleagues