ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
When social networks cross boundaries: a case study of workplace use of facebook and linkedin
Full text PdfPdf (557 KB)
Source
Conference on Supporting Group Work archive
Proceedings of the ACM 2009 international conference on Supporting group work table of contents
Sanibel Island, Florida, USA
SESSION: Social software II table of contents
Pages 95-104  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-500-0
Authors
Meredith M. Skeels  University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
Jonathan Grudin  Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA
Sponsors
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 275,   Downloads (12 Months): 617,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1531674.1531689
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The use of social networking software by professionals is increasing dramatically. How it is used, whether it enhances or reduces productivity, and how enterprise-friendly design and use might evolve are open questions. We examine attitudes and behaviors in a large, technologically-savvy organization through a broad survey and thirty focused interviews. We find extensive social and work uses, with complex patterns that differ with software system and networker age. Tensions arise when use spans social groups and the organization's firewall. Although use is predominantly to support weak ties whose contribution to productivity can be difficult to prove, we anticipate rapid uptake of social networking technology by organizations.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
boyd, d. Viewing American class divisions through Facebook and MySpace. Apophenia Blog, (2007), June 24.
 
2
boyd, d. Taken Out of Context: American Teen Sociality in Networked Publics. PhD Dissertation, University of California-Berkeley. (2008).
 
3
4
5
6
7
 
8
Goffman, E. The presentation of self in everyday life. Anchor (1959)
 
9
Hargittai, E. Whose Space? Differences Among Users and Non-Users of Social Network Sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 1 (2007), article 14.
 
10
Hewitt, A. and Forte, A. Crossing Boundaries: Identity Management and Student/Faculty Relationships on the Facebook. Proc. CSCW 2006 poster. (2006).
 
11
Kornblut, A. Staff Finds White House in the Technological Dark Ages. Washington Post. (January 22, 2009).
 
12
Lafayette, J. Top 10 Social Networking Sites, U.S., Home and Work. TV Week. (April 23, 2008). www.tvweek.com/news/2008/04
 
13
Lovejoy, T. and Grudin, J. Messaging and Formality: Will IM Follow in the Footsteps of Email? Proc. Interact 2003, IOS Press (2003).
 
14
McGrath, J. Time, interaction, and performance (TIP): A theory of groups. Small group research, 22, 2, 147--174. (1991).
 
15
Peluchette, J. and Karl, K. Social Networking Profiles: An Examination of Student Attitudes Regarding Use and Appropriateness of Content, (2008), 11(1): 95--97.
 
16
Rothberg, S. Students Not Using LinkedIn. CollegeRecruiter.com blog, February 27, 2008. www.collegerecruiter.com/weblog/2008/02
 
17
Smith, J. Facebook Surpasses MySpace in US Uniques. Inside Facebook, January 8, 2009. http://www.insidefacebook.com/2009/01/08
 
18
Thompson, C. Brave New World of Digital Intimacy. New York Times Magazine. (September 5, 2008).

Collaborative Colleagues:
Meredith M. Skeels: colleagues
Jonathan Grudin: colleagues