ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Effects of feedback and peer pressure on contributions to enterprise social media
Full text PdfPdf (599 KB)
Source
Conference on Supporting Group Work archive
Proceedings of the ACM 2009 international conference on Supporting group work table of contents
Sanibel Island, Florida, USA
SESSION: Social software I table of contents
Pages 61-70  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-500-0
Authors
Michael J. Brzozowski  Hewlett-Packard Laboratories, Palo Alto, CA, USA
Thomas Sandholm  Hewlett-Packard Laboratories, Palo Alto, CA, USA
Tad Hogg  Hewlett-Packard Laboratories, Palo Alto, CA, USA
Sponsors
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 71,   Downloads (12 Months): 198,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1531674.1531684
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Increasingly, large organizations are experimenting with internal social media (e.g., blogs, forums) as a platform for widespread distributed collaboration. Contributions to their counterparts outside the organization's firewall are driven by attention from strangers, in addition to sharing among friends. However, employees in a workplace under time pressures may be reluctant to participate and the audience for their contributions is comparatively smaller. Participation rates also vary widely from group to group. So what influences people to contribute in this environment?

In this paper, we present the results of a year-long empirical study of internal social media participation at a large technology company, and analyze the impact attention, feedback, and managers' and coworkers' participation have on employees' behavior. We find feedback in the form of posted comments is highly correlated with a user's subsequent participation. Recent manager and coworker activity relate to users initiating or resuming participation in social media. These findings extend, to an aggregate level, the results from prior interviews about blogging at the company and offer design and policy implications for organizations seeking to encourage social media adoption.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
2
3
 
4
Y. Benkler. Coase's penguin, or linux and the nature of the firm. The Yale Law Journal, 112:369--446, 2002.
 
5
G. Box and D. R. Cox. An analysis of transformations. J. of the Royal Statistical Society, B(26):211--252, 1964.
 
6
Y. Bramoulle, H. Djebbari, and B. Fortin. Identification of peer effects through social networks. Technical report, University of Laval, 2006.
7
 
8
B. Butler, L. Sproull, S. Kiesler, and R. Kraut. Community effort in online groups: Who does the work and why? In S. Weisband and L. Atwater, editors, Leadership at a Distance. Erlbaum, 2002.
 
9
 
10
D. Collett. Modelling Binary Data. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2nd edition, 2003.
11
12
13
 
14
15
16
 
17
P. J. Hinds and J. Pfeffer. Why organizations don't "know what they know": Cognitive and motivational factors affecting the transfer of expertise. In M. S. Ackerman, V. Pipek, and V. Wulf, editors, Sharing Expertise: Beyond Knowledge Management, pages 3--26. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2003.
 
18
B. A. Huberman, D. M. Romero, and F. Wu. Crowdsourcing, attention and productivity. CoRR, abs/0809.3030, 2008.
 
19
B. A. Huberman, D. M. Romero, and F. Wu. Social networks that matter: Twitter under the microscope. First Monday, 14(1), January 2009.
20
 
21
 
22
P. Kolari, T. Finin, Y. Yesha, Y. Yesha, K. Lyons, S. Perelgut, and J. Hawkins. On the Structure, Properties and Utility of Internal Corporate Blogs. In Proc. of the int'l conf. on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM 2007), March 2007.
 
23
R. E. Kraut, S. R. Fussel, S. E. Brennan, and J. Siegel. Understanding effects of proximity on collaboration: Implications for technologies to support remote collaborative work. In P. Hinds and S. Kiesler, editors, Distributed Work, pages 137--162. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2002.
 
24
K. R. Lakhani and E. von Hippel. How open source software works: "free" user-to-user assistance. Research Policy, 32(6):923 -- 943, 2003.
25
 
26
C. F. Manski. Identification of Endogenous Social Effects: The Reflection Problem. Review of Economic Studies, 60:531--542, 1993.
27
 
28
J. S. Milton and J. C. Arnold. Introduction to Probability Theory and Statistics. McGraw Hill, 2003.
29
 
30
H. A. Simon. Designing organizations for an information-rich world. In M. Greenberger, editor, Computers, communications, and the public interest, pages 37--72. Johns Hopkins Press, 1971.
 
31
C. Steglich and T. A. Snijders. Dynamic networks and behavior: Separating selection from influence. Technical report, Interuniversity Center for Social Science Theory and Methodology, University of Groningen, 2007.
 
32
Y. Wang and D. R. Fesenmaier. Assessing Motivation of Contribution in Online Communities: An Empirical Investigation of an Online Travel Community. Electronic Markets, 13:33--45, 2003.
 
33
W. W. S. Wei. Time Series Analysis, Univariate and Multivariate Methods. Pearson Addison Wesley, 2006.
34
 
35
 
36
S. Yardi, S. Golder, and M. Brzozowski. The pulse of the corporate blogosphere. In Conf. Supplement of CSCW 2008. ACM, November 8-12 2008.
37

Collaborative Colleagues:
Michael J. Brzozowski: colleagues
Thomas Sandholm: colleagues
Tad Hogg: colleagues