ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Contribution, commercialization & audience: understanding participation in an online creative community
Full text PdfPdf (564 KB)
Source
Conference on Supporting Group Work archive
Proceedings of the ACM 2009 international conference on Supporting group work table of contents
Sanibel Island, Florida, USA
SESSION: Community table of contents
Pages 41-50  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-500-0
Authors
Eric Cook  University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
Stephanie D. Teasley  University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
Mark S. Ackerman  University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
Sponsors
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 26,   Downloads (12 Months): 95,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1531674.1531681
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This paper presents a qualitative study of attitudes towards participation and contribution in an online creative community. The setting of the work is an online community of practice focused on the use and development of a user-customizable music software package called Reaktor. Findings from the study highlight four emergent topics in the discourse related to user contributions to the community: contribution assessment, support for learning, perceptions of audience and tensions about commercialization. Our analysis of these topics frames discussion about the value and challenges of attending to amateur and professional users in online creative communities.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in Context. Westview Press.
2
 
3
Becker, H. S. (1984). Art Worlds. Univ. of California Press.
4
5
 
6
7
 
8
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention. HarperCollins.
9
 
10
Fischer, G. (2001) External and shareable artifacts as opportunities for social creativity in communities of interest. In Proc. of the Fifth Int'l Conference: Computational and Cognitive Models of Creative Design.
 
11
Florida, R. (2004). The Rise of the Creative Class. New York, NY: Basic Books.
 
12
Getzels, J.W. & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1976). The Creative Vision: A Longitudinal Study of Problem Finding in Art Wiley, New York.
13
 
14
Huysman, M.H.; Wenger, E.; Wulf, V. (Eds.) (2003). Proceedings of the First International Conference on Communities and Technologies. Springer.
 
15
Jeppesen, L. B. & Frederiksen, L. (2004) Why firm-established user communities work for innovation. (http:// userinnovation.mit.edu/papers/jepfred2.pdf),
 
16
Kiesler, S., & Cummings, J. N. (2002). What do we know about proximity and distance in work groups? In P. J. Hinds & S. Kiesler (eds.), Distributed Work. MIT Press.
 
17
Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press, UK.
 
18
Leadbeater, C., & Miller, P. (2004) The Pro-Am Revolution. Demos, London.
19
 
20
Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis. SAGE publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
Quintana, C., Namsoo, S et al. (2006). Learner-centered design. In Sawyer, K. (ed.) Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences. Cambridge University Press.
 
25
26
27
 
28
 
29
Shneiderman, B., Fischer, G. et al. (2005). NSF Workshop Report on Creativity Support Tools. (http://www.cs.umd.edu/hcil/CST/report.html).
 
30
 
31
 
32
Stebbins, R. A. (1992). Amateurs, Professionals and Serious Leisure. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.
 
33
Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. Cambridge Univ. Press, UK.
 
34
Turner, F. (2005). Where the Counterculture Met the New Economy: The WELL and the Origins of Virtual Community. Technology and Culture 46.3.
 
35
Von Hippel, E. (2005). Democratizing Innovation. MIT Press.
 
36
 
37
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge University Press.
 
38
Zagal, J., & Bruckman, A. (2005). Learning from samba schools: Cultural institutions as learning environments. Convergence 11(1).

Collaborative Colleagues:
Eric Cook: colleagues
Stephanie D. Teasley: colleagues
Mark S. Ackerman: colleagues