ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Analysis of tag within online social networks
Full text PdfPdf (963 KB)
Source
Conference on Supporting Group Work archive
Proceedings of the ACM 2009 international conference on Supporting group work table of contents
Sanibel Island, Florida, USA
SESSION: Tagging table of contents
Pages 21-30  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-500-0
Authors
Chao Wu  Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
Bo Zhou  Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
Sponsors
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 70,   Downloads (12 Months): 295,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1531674.1531678
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In recent years, tagging systems have been paid increasing attentions from both research communities and system designers. Most popular online social networking sites harness tag for managing and locating contents, for organizing and connecting users, and for recommending and sharing resources. We believe that tag acts like bridge between people and resources. Research on tag and tagging behavior will provide us insight about resource space and user activities on the Internet. In this paper, we present a two-level analysis of the tagging system of Del.icio.us. The results from both two levels confirm each other. In network level, we connect tags by users collaborative tagging to form a social network of tags. By investigating its network feature, we find phenomena of small world and scale-free network. We also discover that the links within this network have relatively strong semantic relatedness. In individual level, users' tagging behaviors and patterns are observed by visualizing their bookmarking history on Del.icio.us. Besides, we study the linked users by their tags and find that users within a subscription network share more common interests than random pairs of users. During the analysis, we also discuss the implications of the findings for the design of tag-based system.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
Arrington, M. Exclusive: Screen shots and feature overview of Delicious 2.0 preview. 2007; Available from: http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/06/exclusive-screen-shots-and-feature-overview-of-delicious-20-preview/.
3
4
 
5
 
6
Cilibrasi, R. and P. Vitanyi, Similarity of Objects and the Meaning of Words, in Theory and Applications of Models of Computation. 2006. p. 21--45.
7
 
8
Mislove, A., K.P. Gummadi, and P. Druschel, Exploiting social networks for Internet search, in Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Hot Topics in Network (HotNets-V). 2006: Irvine, CA.
9
10
11
12
13
14
 
15
Szomszor, M., et al., Folksonomies, the Semantic Web, and Movie Recommendation, in 4th European Semantic Web Conference. 2007: Innsbruck, Austria.
 
16
Mathes, A., Folksonomies - Cooperative Classification and Communication Through Shared Metadata. Computer Mediated Communication, 2004.
 
17
Hammond, T., et al., Social Bookmarking Tools (I): A General Review, in D-Lib Magazine. 2005.
 
18
Nickles, M., T. Froehner, and G. Weiß, Social Annotation of Semantically Heterogeneous Knowledge, in SemAnnot. 2004.
 
19
Golder, et al., The Structure of Collaborative Tagging Systems. 2005.
20
 
21
 
22
A.L, B. and R. Albert, Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks. Science, 1999. 286: p. 509--512.
 
23
Albert, R., H. Jeong, and B. A.L, Diameter of the World-Wide Web. Nature, 1991. 401: p. 130--131.
24
25
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
Opte. Available from: http://www.opte.org.
 
30
Websites as Graphs. Available from: http://www.aharef.info/static/htmlgraph/.
31
 
32
33
 
34
 
35
Lee, S.H., P.-J. Kim, and H. Jeong, Statistical properties of sampled networks. Physical Review E (Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics), 2006. 73(1): p. 016102--7.
36
 
37
 
38
Resnik, P., Using Information Content to Evaluate Semantic Similarity in a Taxonomy, in Proceeding of 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 1995: Montreal. p. 448--453.
39
 
40
Jarmasz, M. and S. Szpakowicz, Roget's Thesaurus and Semantic Similarity, in Proceedings of Conference on Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing (RANLP 2003). 2003: Borovets, Bulgaria. p. 212--219.
 
41
Wattenberg, M., F. Viégas, and K. Hollenbach, Visualizing Activity on Wikipedia with Chromograms, in Human-Computer Interaction - INTERACT 2007. 2008. p. 272--287.
42
 
43
Resnik, P., Semantic similarity in taxonomy: An information-based measure and its application to problems of ambiguity in natural language. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 1999. 11: p. 95--130.
 
44
A. Farahat, P Pirolli, and P Markova, Incremental Methods for Computing Word Pair Similarity. 2004, Tech. Rep. No. TR-04-6-2004.
 
45
Watts, D. and S. Strogatz, Collective Dynamics of Small-world Networks. Nature, 1998. 393: p. 440--442.