| A study on impact of aggressor de-rating in the context of multiple crosstalk effects in circuits |
| Full text |
Pdf
(770 KB)
|
Source
|
Great Lakes Symposium on VLSI
archive
Proceedings of the 19th ACM Great Lakes symposium on VLSI
table of contents
Boston Area, MA, USA
SESSION: Testing
table of contents
Pages 529-534
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-522-2
|
|
Authors
|
|
Alodeep Sanyal
|
University Of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, USA
|
|
Abhisek Pan
|
University Of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, USA
|
|
Sandip Kundu
|
University Of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, USA
|
|
| Sponsors |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 8, Downloads (12 Months): 22, Citation Count: 0
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
Capacitive crosstalk induced signal integrity effects have been studied for over a decade. A typical victim net has multiple aggressors. In worst-case analysis of crosstalk effects, it is customary to assume that (i) all aggressors can switch at the same time and (ii) aggressors themselves are not subject to other crosstalk effects. Further refinements of the worst-case analysis consider (a) Boolean filtering of the aggressors to take logical relationship among them into account and (b) timing filtering to exclude aggressors that cannot switch in the same timing window where the victim node is switching. However, even further refinement is possible by relaxing supposition (ii) above that assumes that aggressors are not subject to noise themselves. In this paper, we present a simulation study that considers multiple crosstalk effects where the aggressors of one net can be victim themselves with signals switching in their neighborhood. The simulations are performed on an innovative compact model that permits circular reasoning in an event-driven, non-zero gate delay, and dynamic simulation framework. Results indicate that when crosstalk on aggressors is also considered while processing crosstalk on a victim, the impact is often mitigated substantially.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
|
| |
2
|
A.K. Goel, and Y.R. Huang. "Modeling of crosstalk among the GaAs VLSI connections," IEEE Proceedings, Part G, Vol. 136, pp. 361--368, 1989
|
| |
3
|
|
| |
4
|
A. Rubio, and R. Anglada. "An approach to crosstalk effect analysis and avoidance techniques in digital CMOS VLSI circuits," Int'l Journal of Electronics, Vol. 65, No. 1, pp. 3--17, 1988
|
| |
5
|
|
| |
6
|
D.S. Gao, A.T. Yang, and S.M. Kang. "Modeling and simulation of interconnection delays and crosstalk in high-speed integrated circuits," IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems, Vol. 37, pp. 1--9, 1990
|
 |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
F. Moll, and A. Rubio. "Spurious signals in digital CMOS VLSI circuits: a propagation analysis," IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems-II: Analog and Digital Signal Processing, Vol. 39, No. 10, pp. 749--752, 1992
|
| |
9
|
|
| |
10
|
|
| |
11
|
M.L. Bushnell, and V.D. Agrawal. "Essentials of Electronic Testing For Digital, Memeory & Mixed-Signal VLSI Circuits," Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA, 2000
|
| |
12
|
|
| |
13
|
|
| |
14
|
|
| |
15
|
S. Voranantakul, and J.L. Prince. "Crosstalk analysis for high-speed pulse propagation in lossy electrical interconnects," IEEE Transactions on Components, Hybrids, and Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 127--136, 1993
|
| |
16
|
|
|