|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ABSTRACT
This paper discusses the impact of migrating from 2-D to 3-D on floorplanning and placement. By looking at a basic formulation of graph cuboidal dual problem, we show that the 3-D case and the 3-layer 2.5-D case are fundamentally more difficult than the 2-D case in terms of computational complexity. By comparison among these cases, the intrinsic complexity in 3-D floorplan structures is revealed in the hard-deciding relations between topological connections and geometrical contacts. The results show future challenges for physical design and CAD of 3-D integrated circuits. REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
INDEX TERMS
Primary Classification:
General Terms:
Keywords:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||