ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
BISM: built-in self map for hybrid crossbar nano-architectures
Full text PdfPdf (479 KB)
Source
Great Lakes Symposium on VLSI archive
Proceedings of the 19th ACM Great Lakes symposium on VLSI table of contents
Boston Area, MA, USA
POSTER SESSION: Poster session 1 table of contents
Pages 153-156  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-522-2
Author
Mehdi B. Tahoori  Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGDA: ACM Special Interest Group on Design Automation
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6,   Downloads (12 Months): 32,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1531542.1531581
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In hybrid nano architectures, self-assembled nanoscale crossbars are fabricated on top a reliable CMOS subsystem. Bottom-up selfassembly process used in the fabrication of nanoscale devices yields significantly more defects compared to the conventional top-down lithography used in CMOS fabrication. Therefore, applying defect tolerant design schemes is inevitable in order to map the design to these programmable fabrics by bypassing defects. In this paper, we present an alternative approach for defect tolerant mapping in which the mapping phase is built into the programmable fabric and reliable on-chip resources are used for on-the-fly defectfree mapping. This built-in self map (BISM) scheme significantly reduces the complexity of defect tolerance during design time as well as post-fabrication configuration time. Various BISMschemes are presented and their efficiencies in terms of defect tolerance and mapping time are compared.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
C.P. Collier, E.W.Wong, M. Belohradsky, F.M. Raymo, J.F. Stoddart, P.J. Kuekes, R.S. Williams, and J.R. Heath. Electronically Configurable Molecular-Based Logic Gates. In Science, volume 285, pages 391--394, 1999.
 
3
Y. Cui and C.M. Lieber. Functional Nanoscale Electronics Devices Assembled Using Silicon Nanowire Building Blocks. In Science, volume 291, pages 851--853, 2001.
 
4
X. Ma, D. Strukov, J. Lee, and K. Likharev. Afterlife for Silicon: CMOL Circuit Architectures. In Proc. IEEE Conf. on Nanotechnology, pages 175--178, 2005.
 
5
D. Strukov and K. Likharev. CMOL FPGA: A Reconfigurable Architecture for Hybrid Digital Circuits with Two-terminal Nanodevices. In Nanotechnology, volume 16, pages 888--900, 2005.
 
6
A. DeHon. Array-Based Architecture for FET-Based, Nanoscale Electronics. In IEEE Trans. on Nanotechnology, volume 2, pages 23--32, 2003.
7
 
8
M.M. Ziegler and M.R. Stan. Design and Analysis of Crossbar Circuits for Molecular Nanoelectronics. In Proc. IEEE Int'l Conf. on Nanotechnology, pages 323--327, 2002.
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
T. Rueckes, K. Kim, E. Joselevich, G.Y. Tseng, C.L. Cheung, and C.M. Lieber. Carbon Nanotube-based Nonvolatile Random Access Memory for Molecular Computing. In Science, volume 289, pages 94--97, 2000.
 
14
A. DeHon, P. Lincoln, and J.E. Savage. Stochastic Assembly of Sublithographic Nanoscale Interfaces. In IEEE Trans. on Nanotechnology, volume 2, pages 165--174, 2003.
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
H. Naeimi and A. DeHon. A Greedy Algorithm for Tolerating Defective Crosspoints in NanoPLA Design. In Proc. Int'l Conf. on Field-Programmable Technology, pages 49--56, 2004.
 
19