|
ABSTRACT
We describe a method for improving the quality of <i>n</i>-detection test sets. Unlike earlier methods for achieving the same goal, the proposed method is based on the conventional definition of the number of detections and uses a conventional <i>n</i>-detection test generation process. Under the proposed method, the set of target faults is partitioned into two or more subsets. <i>n</i>-detection test generation is carried out for each subset separately. The resulting test sets are combined into a single test set. Partitioning causes more faults to be targeted directly, and fewer faults to be dropped due to accidental detection. The fault subsets can be selected based on detection conditions of common defects. In this work we partition the set of faults into a subset that consists of all the stuck-at 0 faults, and a subset that consists of all the stuck-at 1 faults. We demonstrate through experimental results that for the same test set size, partitioning the set of faults improves the coverage of untargeted faults (non-feedback four-way bridging faults) compared to <i>n</i>-detection test generation for the unpartitioned set of faults.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
M. Abramovici, M.A. Breuer and A.D. Friedman, Digital Systems Testing and Testable Design, IEEE Press, 1995.
|
| |
2
|
|
| |
3
|
S. Sengupta et. al., "Defect-Based Tests: A Key Enabler for Successful Migration to Structural Test", Intel Technology Journal, Q.1, 1999.
|
| |
4
|
|
| |
5
|
|
| |
6
|
W. Maly, P.K. Nag and P. Nigh, "Testing Oriented Analysis of CMOS ICs with Opens", IEEE Trans. on Computer-Aided Design, Nov. 1988, pp. 344--347.
|
| |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
M. Renovell and G.M. Cambon, "Electrical Analysis of Floating-Gate Fault", IEEE Trans. on Computer-Aided Design, Nov. 1992, pp. 1450--1458.
|
| |
9
|
|
| |
10
|
H. Konuk, "Voltage and Current based Fault Simulation for Interconnect Open Defects", IEEE Trans. on Computer-Aided Design, Dec. 1999, pp. 1768--1779.
|
| |
11
|
|
| |
12
|
|
| |
13
|
R. Rodriguez-Montanes and J. Figueras, "Electrical and Topological Characterization of Interconnect Open Defects" IEEE Intl. Workshop on Current and Defect Based Testing, 2005.
|
| |
14
|
|
 |
15
|
J. E. Nelson , J. G. Brown , R. Desineni , R. D. Blanton, Multiple-detect ATPG based on physical neighborhoods, Proceedings of the 43rd annual Design Automation Conference, July 24-28, 2006, San Francisco, CA, USA
[doi> 10.1145/1146909.1147186]
|
| |
16
|
|
| |
17
|
S.M. Reddy, I. Pomeranz and S. Kajihara, "Compact Test Sets for High Defect Coverage", IEEE Trans. on Computer-Aided Design, Aug. 1997, pp. 923--930.
|
| |
18
|
|
| |
19
|
|
| |
20
|
|
| |
21
|
B. Benware, C. Schuermyer, N. Tamarapalli, K.-H. Tsai, S. Ranganathan, R. Madge, J. Rajski and P. Krishnamurthy, "Impact of multiple-detect test patterns on product quality", in Proc. Intl. Test Conf., 2003, pp. 1031--1040.
|
| |
22
|
Srikanth Venkataraman , Srihari Sivaraj , Enamul Amyeen , Sangbong Lee , Ajay Ojha , Ruifeng Guo, An Experimental Study of N-Detect Scan ATPG Patterns on a Processor, Proceedings of the 22nd IEEE VLSI Test Symposium, p.23, April 25-29, 2004
|
| |
23
|
Huaxing Tang , Gang Chen , Sudhakar M. Reddy , Chen Wang , Janusz Rajski , Irith Pomeranz, Defect Aware Test Patterns, Proceedings of the conference on Design, Automation and Test in Europe, p.450-455, March 07-11, 2005
[doi> 10.1109/DATE.2005.110]
|
 |
24
|
|
|