ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Digital Library logoTake a look at the new version of this page: [ beta version ]. Tell us what you think.
Invertible motion blur in video
Full text MovMov (24:39),  PdfPdf (13.85 MB)
Source
ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) archive
Volume 28 ,  Issue 3  (August 2009) table of contents
Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH 2009
SESSION: Computational cameras table of contents
Article No.: 95  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISSN:0730-0301
Also published in ...
Authors
Amit Agrawal  Mitsubishi Electric Research Labs (MERL), Cambridge, MA
Yi Xu  Mitsubishi Electric Research Labs (MERL), Cambridge, MA
Ramesh Raskar  MIT Media Lab, Cambridge, MA
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 68,   Downloads (12 Months): 333,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1531326.1531401
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We show that motion blur in successive video frames is invertible even if the point-spread function (PSF) due to motion smear in a single photo is non-invertible. Blurred photos exhibit nulls (zeros) in the frequency transform of the PSF, leading to an ill-posed deconvolution. Hardware solutions to avoid this require specialized devices such as the coded exposure camera or accelerating sensor motion. We employ ordinary video cameras and introduce the notion of null-filling along with joint-invertibility of multiple blur-functions. The key idea is to record the same object with varying PSFs, so that the nulls in the frequency component of one frame can be filled by other frames. The combined frequency transform becomes null-free, making deblurring well-posed. We achieve jointly-invertible blur simply by changing the exposure time of successive frames. We address the problem of automatic deblurring of objects moving with constant velocity by solving the four critical components: preservation of all spatial frequencies, segmentation of moving parts, motion estimation of moving parts, and non-degradation of the static parts of the scene. We demonstrate several challenging cases of object motion blur including textured backgrounds and partial occluders.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Agrawal, A., and Raskar, R. 2007. Resolving Objects at Higher Resolution from a Single Motion-blurred Image. In Proc. Conf. Comp. Vision and Pattern Recognition, 1--8.
 
2
 
3
 
4
Berenstein, C., and Patrick, E. 1990. Exact Deconvolution for Multiple Convolution Operators-an Overview, plus Performance Characterizations for Imaging Sensors. Proc. of the IEEE 78 (Apr.), 723--734.
 
5
 
6
Chen, J., Yuan, L., Tang, C.-K., and Quan, L. 2008. Robust Dual Motion Deblurring. In Proc. Conf. Comp. Vision and Pattern Recognition, 1--8.
 
7
Cho, S., Matsushita, Y., and Lee, S. 2007. Removing Non-Uniform Motion Blur from Images. In Proc. Int'l Conf. Computer Vision, 1--8.
 
8
Dai, S., and Wu, Y. 2008. Motion from Blur. In Proc. Conf. Comp. Vision and Pattern Recognition, 1--8.
 
9
 
10
Dowski, E. R., and Cathey, W. 1995. Extended Depth of Field through Wavefront Coding. Appl. Optics 34, 11 (Apr.), 1859--1866.
11
 
12
Grossberg, M., and Nayar, S. 2003. High Dynamic Range from Multiple Images: Which Exposures to Combine? In ICCV Workshop on Color and Photometric Methods in Computer Vision (CPMCV).
 
13
 
14
Jia, J. 2007. Single Image Motion Deblurring using Transparency. In Proc. Conf. Comp. Vision and Pattern Recognition, 1--8.
 
15
Joshi, N., Szeliski, R., and Kriegman, D. 2008. PSF Estimation using Sharp Edge Prediction. In Proc. Conf. Comp. Vision and Pattern Recognition, 1--8.
16
 
17
18
 
19
Lucy, L. 1974. An iterative technique for the rectification of observed distributions. J. Astronomy 79, 745--754.
 
20
Mann, S., and Picard, R. W. 1995. Being Undigital with Digital Cameras: Extending Dynamic Range by Combining Differently Exposed Pictures. In Proc. of IS&T 48th Annual Conference, 422--428.
 
21
 
22
Piccardi, M. 2004. Background Subtraction Techniques: a Review. In Proc. IEEE SMC Intl. Conf. Systems, Man and Cybernetics.
23
 
24
 
25
Richardson, W. 1972. Bayesian-based iterative method of image restoration. J. Opt. Soc. of America 62, 1, 55--59.
 
26
Schultz, R. R., and Stevenson, R. L. 1996. Extraction of High-Resolution Frames from Video Sequences. IEEE Trans. Image Processing 5 (jun), 996--1011.
 
27
Sellent, A., Eisemann, M., and Magnor, M. 2008. Calculating Motion Fields from Images with Two Different Exposure Times. Tech. rep., Computer Graphics Lab, Technical University of Braunschweig, 5.
28
 
29
 
30
Tai., W. Y., Hao, D., Brown, M. S., and Lin, S. 2008. Image/Video Deblurring using a Hybrid Camera. In Proc. Conf. Comp. Vision and Pattern Recognition, 1--8.
 
31
Telleen, J., Sullivan, A., Yee, J., Gunawardane, P., Wang, O., Collins, I., and Davis, J. 2007. Synthetic Shutter Speed Imaging. In Proc. Eurographics, 591--598.
32
33
34

Collaborative Colleagues:
Amit Agrawal: colleagues
Yi Xu: colleagues
Ramesh Raskar: colleagues