ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Video SnapCut: robust video object cutout using localized classifiers
Full text PdfPdf (23.69 MB)
Source
ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) archive
Volume 28 ,  Issue 3  (August 2009) table of contents
Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH 2009
SESSION: Visual, cut, paste, and search table of contents
Article No. 70  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISSN:0730-0301
Also published in ...
Authors
Xue Bai  University of Minnesota
Jue Wang  Adobe Systems
David Simons  Adobe Systems
Guillermo Sapiro  University of Minnesota
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 44,   Downloads (12 Months): 164,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

appendices and supplements   abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1531326.1531376
What is a DOI?

APPENDICES and SUPPLEMENTS
The auxillary file for the paper


ABSTRACT

Although tremendous success has been achieved for interactive object cutout in still images, accurately extracting dynamic objects in video remains a very challenging problem. Previous video cutout systems present two major limitations: (1) reliance on global statistics, thus lacking the ability to deal with complex and diverse scenes; and (2) treating segmentation as a global optimization, thus lacking a practical workflow that can guarantee the convergence of the systems to the desired results.

We present Video SnapCut, a robust video object cutout system that significantly advances the state-of-the-art. In our system segmentation is achieved by the collaboration of a set of local classifiers, each adaptively integrating multiple local image features. We show how this segmentation paradigm naturally supports local user editing and propagates them across time. The object cutout system is completed with a novel coherent video matting technique. A comprehensive evaluation and comparison is presented, demonstrating the effectiveness of the proposed system at achieving high quality results, as well as the robustness of the system against various types of inputs.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
2
 
3
 
4
Bai, X., and Sapiro, G. 2007. A geodesic framework for fast interactive image and video segmentation and matting. In Proc. of IEEE ICCV.
 
5
Blake, A., and Isard, M. 1998. Active Contours. Springer-Verlag.
 
6
7
8
 
9
Kohli, P., Kumar, M. P., and Torr, P. H. S. 2007. P3 & beyond: solving energies with higher order cliques. In Proc. of IEEE CVPR.
10
 
11
12
13
 
14
Li, Y., Adelson, E., and Agarwala, A. 2008. Scribbleboost: Adding classification to edge-aware interpolation of local image and video adjustments. In Proc. of EGSR, 1255--1264.
 
15
16
 
17
Protiere, A., and Sapiro, G. 2007. Interactive image segmentation via adaptive weighted distances. IEEE Trans. Image Processing 16, 1046--1057.
18
 
19
Stewart, S., 2003. Confessions of a roto artist: Three rules for better mattes. http://www.pinnaclesys.com/SupportFiles/Rotoscoping.pdf
 
20
Wandell, B. 1995. Foundations of Vision. Sinauer Associates.
 
21
 
22
Wang, J., and Cohen, M. 2007. Optimized color sampling for robust matting. In Proc. of IEEE CVPR.
23
24
25
 
26
 
27

Collaborative Colleagues:
Xue Bai: colleagues
Jue Wang: colleagues
David Simons: colleagues
Guillermo Sapiro: colleagues