ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
An empirical BSSRDF model
Full text PdfPdf (4.34 MB)
Source
ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) archive
Volume 28 ,  Issue 3  (August 2009) table of contents
Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH 2009
SESSION: Light and materials table of contents
Article No. 30  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISSN:0730-0301
Also published in ...
Authors
Craig Donner  Columbia University
Jason Lawrence  University of Virginia
Ravi Ramamoorthi  UC Berkeley
Toshiya Hachisuka  UC San Diego
Henrik Wann Jensen  UC San Diego
Shree Nayar  Columbia University
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 75,   Downloads (12 Months): 212,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

appendices and supplements   abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1531326.1531336
What is a DOI?

APPENDICES and SUPPLEMENTS
The zip file contains two main subdirectories: measurements/ - measured data used for for validation simulations/ - simulated data and fits Each subdirectory contains a file readme.html with more details.


ABSTRACT

We present a new model of the homogeneous BSSRDF based on large-scale simulations. Our model captures the appearance of materials that are not accurately represented using existing single scattering models or multiple isotropic scattering models (e.g. the diffusion approximation). We use an analytic function to model the 2D hemispherical distribution of exitant light at a point on the surface, and a table of parameter values of this function computed at uniformly sampled locations over the remaining dimensions of the BSSRDF domain. This analytic function is expressed in elliptic coordinates and has six parameters which vary smoothly with surface position, incident angle, and the underlying optical properties of the material (albedo, mean free path length, phase function and the relative index of refraction). Our model agrees well with measured data, and is compact, requiring only 250MB to represent the full spatial- and angular-distribution of light across a wide spectrum of materials. In practice, rendering a single material requires only about 100KB to represent the BSSRDF.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
2
 
3
Cerezo, E., Perez-Cazorla, F., Pueyo, X., Seron, F., and Sillion, F. 2005. A survey on participating media rendering techniques. The Visual Computer.
4
5
 
6
Donner, C., and Jensen, H. W. 2007. Rendering translucent materials using photon diffusion. In Rendering Techniques, 243--251.
7
8
9
 
10
Jensen, H. W., Legakis, J., and Dorsey, J. 1999. Rendering of wet materials. In Rendering Techniques, 273--282.
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
Joshi, N., Donner, C., and Jensen, H. W. 2006. Noninvasive measurement of scattering anisotropy in turbid materials by nonnormal incident illumination. Opt. Lett. 31, 936--938.
15
 
16
Korn, G. A., and Korn, T. M. 2000. Mathematical Handbook for Scientists and Engineers: Definitions, Theorems, and Formulas for Reference and Review. Courier Dover Publications.
 
17
Li, H., Pellacini, F., and Torrance, K. 2005. A hybrid monte carlo method for accurate and efficient subsurface scattering. In Rendering Techniques, 283--290.
18
19
 
20
Nicodemus, F. E., Richmond, J. C., Hsia, J. J., Ginsberg, I. W., and Limperis, T. 1977. Geometrical Considerations and Nomenclature for Reflectance. National Bureau of Standards.
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
Premoze, S., Ashikhmin, M., Tessendorf, J., Ramamoorthi, R., and Nayar, S. 2004. Practical rendering of multiple scattering effects in participating media. In Rendering Techniques, 363--374.
 
25
Stam, J. 1995. Multiple scattering as a diffusion process. In Rendering Techniques, 41--50.
26
27
28
 
29

Collaborative Colleagues:
Craig Donner: colleagues
Jason Lawrence: colleagues
Ravi Ramamoorthi: colleagues
Toshiya Hachisuka: colleagues
Henrik Wann Jensen: colleagues
Shree Nayar: colleagues