ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
How well do line drawings depict shape?
Full text PdfPdf (3.96 MB)
Source
ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) archive
Volume 28 ,  Issue 3  (August 2009) table of contents
Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH 2009
SESSION: Perception and depiction table of contents
Article No. 28  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISSN:0730-0301
Also published in ...
Authors
Forrester Cole  Princeton University
Kevin Sanik  Rutgers University
Doug DeCarlo  Rutgers University
Adam Finkelstein  Princeton University
Thomas Funkhouser  Princeton University
Szymon Rusinkiewicz  Princeton University and Adobe Systems
Manish Singh  Rutgers University
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 82,   Downloads (12 Months): 270,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1531326.1531334
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This paper investigates the ability of sparse line drawings to depict 3D shape. We perform a study in which people are shown an image of one of twelve 3D objects depicted with one of six styles and asked to orient a gauge to coincide with the surface normal at many positions on the object's surface. The normal estimates are compared with each other and with ground truth data provided by a registered 3D surface model to analyze accuracy and precision. The paper describes the design decisions made in collecting a large data set (275,000 gauge measurements) and provides analysis to answer questions about how well people interpret shapes from drawings. Our findings suggest that people interpret certain shapes almost as well from a line drawing as from a shaded image, that current computer graphics line drawing techniques can effectively depict shape and even match the effectiveness of artist's drawings, and that errors in depiction are often localized and can be traced to particular properties of the lines used. The data collected for this study will become a publicly available resource for further studies of this type.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
3
 
4
Cole, F., Decarlo, D., Finkelstein, A., Kin, K., Morley, K., and Santella, A. 2006. Directing gaze in 3D models with stylized focus. Eurographics Symposium on Rendering (June), 377--387.
5
6
7
8
9
 
10
Fleming, R. W., Torralba, A., and Adelson, E. H. 2004. Specular reflections and the perception of shape. Journal of Vision 4, 9, 798--820.
 
11
Fulvio, J. M., Singh, M., and Maloney, L. T. 2006. Combining achromatic and chromatic cues to transparency. Journal of Vision 6, 8, 760--776.
12
 
13
 
14
15
16
 
17
Kaplan, M., and Cohen, E. 2006. Producing models from drawings of curved surfaces. In Eurographics Workshop on Sketch-Based Interfaces and Modeling, 51--58.
 
18
Koenderink, J. J., van Doorn, A., and Kappers, A. 1992. Surface perception in pictures. Perception and Psychophysics 52, 487--496.
 
19
Koenderink, J. J., van Doorn, A., Christou, C., and Lappin, J. 1996. Shape constancy in pictorial relief. Perception 25, 155--164.
 
20
Koenderink, J. J., van Doorn, A., Kappers, A. M., and Todd, J. T. 2001. Ambiguity and the 'mental eye' in pictorial relief. Perception 30, 431--448.
 
21
Koenderink, J. J. 1984. What does the occluding contour tell us about solid shape? Perception 13, 321--330.
22
 
23
Langer, M. S., and Bülthoff, H. H. 2001. A prior for global convexity in local shape-from-shading. Perception 30, 4, 403--410.
24
 
25
Malik, J. 1987. Interpreting line drawings of curved objects. International Journal of Computer Vision 1, 1, 73--103.
 
26
Mamassian, P., and Landy, M. S. 1998. Observer biases in the 3d interpretation of line drawings. Vision Research 38.
 
27
28
29
30
 
31
Pauly, M., Keiser, R., and Gross, M. 2003. Multi-scale feature extraction on point-sampled surfaces. Computer Graphics Forum 22, 3 (Sept.), 281--290.
 
32
Phillips, F., Todd, J. T., Koenderink, J. J., and Kappers, A. M. 2003. Perceptual representation of visible surfaces. Perception and Psychophysics 65, 5, 747--762.
33
34
 
35
 
36
Todd, J. T., Koenderink, J. J., van Doorn, A. J., and Kappers, A. M. 1996. Effects of changing viewing conditions on the perceived structure of smoothly curved surfaces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 22, 695--706.
37
 
38
Waltz, D. L. 1975. Understanding line drawings of scenes with shadows. In The Psychology of Computer Vision, P. Winston, Ed. McGraw-Hill, 19--92.
 
39
Willats, J. 1997. Art and Representation: New Principles in the Analysis of Pictures. Princeton University Press.
40

Collaborative Colleagues:
Forrester Cole: colleagues
Kevin Sanik: colleagues
Doug DeCarlo: colleagues
Adam Finkelstein: colleagues
Thomas Funkhouser: colleagues
Szymon Rusinkiewicz: colleagues
Manish Singh: colleagues