Toward evaluating lighting design interface paradigms for novice users

ABSTRACT

Lighting design is a complex but fundamental task in computer cinematography, involving the adjustment of light parameters to define final scene appearance. Many user interfaces have been proposed to simplify lighting design. They can be generally categorized in three paradigms: direct light parameter manipulation, indirect light feature manipulation (e.g., shadow dragging), and goal-based optimization of lighting through painting. To this date, no formal evaluation of the relative effectiveness of these paradigms has been performed.

In this paper, we present a first step toward evaluating the benefits of these three paradigms in the form of a user study with a focus on novice users. 20 subjects participated in the experiment by performing various trials on simple scenes with up to 8 point lights, designed to test two lighting tasks: precise adjustment of lighting and the artistic exploration of lighting configurations. We collected objective and subjective data and found that subjects can light well with direct and indirect interfaces, preferring the latter. Paint-based goal specification was found to be significantly worse than the other paradigms, especially since users tend to sketch rather than accurately paint goal images, an input that painting algorithms were not designed for. We also found that given enough time, novices can perform relatively complex lighting tasks, unhindered by geometry or lighting complexity. Finally, we believe that our study will impact the design of future lighting interfaces and it will serve as the basis for designing additional experiments to reach a comprehensive evaluation of lighting interfaces.

REFERENCES

• 1: Adobe Systems Inc, 2009. Photoshop CS 4.
• 2: Xiaobo An , Fabio Pellacini, AppProp: all-pairs appearance-space edit propagation, ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), v.27 n.3, August 2008
• 3: Anrys, F., and Dutré, P. 2004. Image based lighting design. In 4th IASTED International Conference on Visualization, Imaging, and Image Processing.
• 4: Autodesk Inc, 2008. Softimage xsi 7.
• 5: Autodesk Inc, 2009. Maya 2009.
• 6: Calahan, S. 1999. Storytelling through lighting, a computer graphics perspective. In Advanced RenderMan: Creating CGI for Motion Pictures, A. A. Apodaca, L. Gritz, and R. Barzel, Eds. Morgan Kaufmann, 223--233.
• 7: Brookshire D. Conner , Scott S. Snibbe , Kenneth P. Herndon , Daniel C. Robbins , Robert C. Zeleznik , Andries van Dam, Three-dimensional widgets, Proceedings of the 1992 symposium on Interactive 3D graphics, p.183-188, June 1992, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States [doi>10.1145/147156.147199]
• 8: Costa, A. C., Sousa, A. A., and Ferreira, F. N. 1999. Lighting design: A goal based approach using optimization. In Rendering Techniques '99, 317--328.
• 9: Friedman, M. 1937. The use of ranks to avoid the assumption of normality implicit in the analysis of variance. Journal of the American Statistical Association 32, 200, 675--701.
• 10: Michael Gleicher , Andrew Witkin, Through-the-lens camera control, Proceedings of the 19th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, p.331-340, July 1992
• 11: Stefan Gumhold, Maximum entropy light source placement, Proceedings of the conference on Visualization '02, October 27-November 01, 2002, Boston, Massachusetts
• 12: John K. Kawai , James S. Painter , Michael F. Cohen, Radioptimization: goal based rendering, Proceedings of the 20th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, p.147-154, August 02-06, 1993, Anaheim, CA [doi>10.1145/166117.166136]
• 13: Chang Ha Lee , Xuejun Hao , Amitabh Varshney, Light Collages: Lighting Design for Effective Visualization, Proceedings of the conference on Visualization '04, p.281-288, October 10-15, 2004 [doi>10.1109/VIS.2004.62]
• 14: J. Marks , B. Andalman , P. A. Beardsley , W. Freeman , S. Gibson , J. Hodgins , T. Kang , B. Mirtich , H. Pfister , W. Ruml , K. Ryall , J. Seims , S. Shieber, Design galleries: a general approach to setting parameters for computer graphics and animation, Proceedings of the 24th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, p.389-400, August 1997 [doi>10.1145/258734.258887]
• 15: David Anderson , Emily Anderson , Neal Lesh , Joe Marks , Brian Mirtich , David Ratajczak , Kathy Ryall, Human-Guided Simple Search, Proceedings of the Seventeenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Twelfth Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence, p.209-216, July 30-August 03, 2000
• 16: Mohan, A., Tumblin, J., Bodenheimer, B., Grimm, C., and Bailey, R. 2005. Table-top computed lighting for practical digital photography. In Rendering Techniques 2005: 16th Eurographics Workshop on Rendering, 165--172.
• 17: Okabe, M., Matsushita, Y., Shen, L., and Igarashi, T. 2007. Illumination brush: Interactive design of all-frequency lighting. 171--180.
• 18: Patow, G., and Pueyo, X. 2003. A survey of inverse rendering problems. In Computer graphics forum, vol. 22, 663--687.
• 19: Fabio Pellacini , Jason Lawrence, AppWand: editing measured materials using appearance-driven optimization, ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), v.26 n.3, July 2007
• 20: Fabio Pellacini , Parag Tole , Donald P. Greenberg, A user interface for interactive cinematic shadow design, ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), v.21 n.3, July 2002
• 21: Fabio Pellacini , Frank Battaglia , R. Keith Morley , Adam Finkelstein, Lighting with paint, ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), v.26 n.2, p.9-es, June 07 [doi>10.1145/1243980.1243983]
• 22: Pierre Poulin , Alain Fournier, Lights from highlights and shadows, Proceedings of the 1992 symposium on Interactive 3D graphics, p.31-38, June 1992, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States [doi>10.1145/147156.147160]
• 23: Pierre Poulin , Karim Ratib , Marco Jacques, Sketching Shadows and Highlights to Position Lights, Proceedings of the 1997 Conference on Computer Graphics International, p.56, June 23-27, 1997
• 24: Chris Schoeneman , Julie Dorsey , Brian Smits , James Arvo , Donald Greenberg, Painting with light, Proceedings of the 20th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, p.143-146, August 02-06, 1993, Anaheim, CA [doi>10.1145/166117.166135]
• 25: Shacked, R., and Lischinski, D. 2001. Automatic lighting design using a perceptual quality metric. In Computer graphics forum, vol. 20, 215--227.
• 26: Amit Shesh , Baoquan Chen, Crayon lighting: sketch-guided illumination of models, Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques in Australia and Southeast Asia, December 01-04, 2007, Perth, Australia [doi>10.1145/1321261.1321278]
• 27: J Stevens, Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences, L. Erlbaum Associates Inc., Hillsdale, NJ, 1986
• 28: Peter Vangorp , Jurgen Laurijssen , Philip Dutré, The influence of shape on the perception of material reflectance, ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), v.26 n.3, July 2007

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  I. Computing Methodologies
  I.3 COMPUTER GRAPHICS
      I.3.7 Three-Dimensional Graphics and Realism

Additional Classification:
  I. Computing Methodologies
  I.3 COMPUTER GRAPHICS
      I.3.6 Methodology and Techniques
          Subjects: Interaction techniques
  I.6 SIMULATION AND MODELING
      I.6.4 Model Validation and Analysis
      I.6.5 Model Development
          Subjects: Modeling methodologies

General Terms:
Algorithms, Design, Performance, Theory