ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
MotionCast: on the capacity and delay tradeoffs
Full text PdfPdf (582 KB)
Source
International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking & Computing archive
Proceedings of the tenth ACM international symposium on Mobile ad hoc networking and computing table of contents
New Orleans, LA, USA
SESSION: Information dissemination and location service table of contents
Pages 289-298  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-624-3
Authors
Chenhui Hu  Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
Xinbing Wang  Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
Feng Wu  Microsoft Research Asia, Beijing, China
Sponsors
SIGMOBILE: ACM Special Interest Group on Mobility of Systems, Users, Data and Computing
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): n/a,   Downloads (12 Months): n/a,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1530748.1530789
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we define multicast for ad hoc network through nodes' mobility as MotionCast, and study the capacity and delay tradeoffs for it. Assuming nodes move according to an independently and identically distributed (i.i.d.) pattern and each desires to send packets to k distinctive destinations, we compare the capacity and delay in two transmission protocols: one uses 2-hop relay algorithm without redundancy, the other adopts the scheme of redundant packets transmissions to improve delay while at the expense of the capacity. In addition, we obtain the maximum capacity and the minimum delay under certain constraints. We find that the per-node capacity and delay for 2-hop algorithm without redundancy are Θ(1/k) and Θ(nlog k), respectively; and for 2-hop algorithm with redundancy they are Ω(1/(knlog k)) and Θ(√nlog k), respectively. The capacity of the 2-hop relay algorithm without redundancy is better than the multicast capacity of static networks developed in [3] as long as k is strictly less than n in an order sense; while when k=Θ(n), mobility does not increase capacity anymore. The ratio between delay and capacity satisfies delay/rateO(nklog k) for these two protocols, which is smaller than that of directly extending the fundamental tradeoff for unicast established in [1] to multicast, i.e., O(nk2).


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
M.J. Neely, and E. Modiano, "Capaicty and delay tradeoffs for ad hoc mobile networks," IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 1917--1937, Jun. 2005.
 
2
X. Lin and N. B. Shroff, "The fundamental capacity-delay tradeoff in large mobile wireless networks", Technical Report, 2004. Available at http://cobweb.ecn.purdue.edu/~linx/papers.html
3
 
4
P. Gupta and P. R. Kumar, "The capacity of wireless networks," IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 388--404, Mar. 2000.
5
 
6
7
 
8
 
9
A.E. Gamal, J. Mammen, B. Prabhakar, and D. Shah, "Throughput-delay trade-off in wireless networks," in Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM, Mar. 2004.
 
10
Lei Ying, Sichao Yang and R. Srikant, "Optimal delay-throughput trade-offs in mobile ad hoc Networks," IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 54, no. 9, pp. 4119--4143, Sept. 2008.
 
11
S. Toumpis and A.J. Goldsmith, "Large wireless networks under fading, mobility, and delay constraints," in Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM, Mar. 2004.
12
 
13
R.L. Cruz and A.V. Santhanam, "Hierarchical link scheduling and power control in multihop wireless networks," in Proceedings of the Annual Allerton Conference on communication, Control and Computing, Oct. 2002.
 
14
 
15
S.M. Ross, Stochastic processes. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1996.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Chenhui Hu: colleagues
Xinbing Wang: colleagues
Feng Wu: colleagues