| MotionCast: on the capacity and delay tradeoffs |
| Full text |
Pdf
(582 KB)
|
Source
|
International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking & Computing
archive
Proceedings of the tenth ACM international symposium on Mobile ad hoc networking and computing
table of contents
New Orleans, LA, USA
SESSION: Information dissemination and location service
table of contents
Pages 289-298
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-624-3
|
|
Authors
|
|
Chenhui Hu
|
Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
|
|
Xinbing Wang
|
Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
|
|
Feng Wu
|
Microsoft Research Asia, Beijing, China
|
|
| Sponsors |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): n/a, Downloads (12 Months): n/a, Citation Count: 0
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
In this paper, we define multicast for ad hoc network through nodes' mobility as MotionCast, and study the capacity and delay tradeoffs for it. Assuming nodes move according to an independently and identically distributed (i.i.d.) pattern and each desires to send packets to k distinctive destinations, we compare the capacity and delay in two transmission protocols: one uses 2-hop relay algorithm without redundancy, the other adopts the scheme of redundant packets transmissions to improve delay while at the expense of the capacity. In addition, we obtain the maximum capacity and the minimum delay under certain constraints. We find that the per-node capacity and delay for 2-hop algorithm without redundancy are Θ(1/k) and Θ(nlog k), respectively; and for 2-hop algorithm with redundancy they are Ω(1/(k√nlog k)) and Θ(√nlog k), respectively. The capacity of the 2-hop relay algorithm without redundancy is better than the multicast capacity of static networks developed in [3] as long as k is strictly less than n in an order sense; while when k=Θ(n), mobility does not increase capacity anymore. The ratio between delay and capacity satisfies delay/rate ≥ O(nklog k) for these two protocols, which is smaller than that of directly extending the fundamental tradeoff for unicast established in [1] to multicast, i.e., O(nk2).
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
M.J. Neely, and E. Modiano, "Capaicty and delay tradeoffs for ad hoc mobile networks," IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 1917--1937, Jun. 2005.
|
| |
2
|
X. Lin and N. B. Shroff, "The fundamental capacity-delay tradeoff in large mobile wireless networks", Technical Report, 2004. Available at http://cobweb.ecn.purdue.edu/~linx/papers.html
|
 |
3
|
|
| |
4
|
P. Gupta and P. R. Kumar, "The capacity of wireless networks," IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 388--404, Mar. 2000.
|
 |
5
|
|
| |
6
|
|
 |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
|
| |
9
|
A.E. Gamal, J. Mammen, B. Prabhakar, and D. Shah, "Throughput-delay trade-off in wireless networks," in Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM, Mar. 2004.
|
| |
10
|
Lei Ying, Sichao Yang and R. Srikant, "Optimal delay-throughput trade-offs in mobile ad hoc Networks," IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 54, no. 9, pp. 4119--4143, Sept. 2008.
|
| |
11
|
S. Toumpis and A.J. Goldsmith, "Large wireless networks under fading, mobility, and delay constraints," in Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM, Mar. 2004.
|
 |
12
|
|
| |
13
|
R.L. Cruz and A.V. Santhanam, "Hierarchical link scheduling and power control in multihop wireless networks," in Proceedings of the Annual Allerton Conference on communication, Control and Computing, Oct. 2002.
|
| |
14
|
|
| |
15
|
S.M. Ross, Stochastic processes. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1996.
|
|